Search "user:jk_182"

@FireWorks said in #14: > BTW, which software runs SF the most efficiently? I'm not sure if running SF through lichess is that great, considering javascript can be slow. The fastest way must be runnin…

@FireWorks said in #10: > Engines generally aren't that good at solving tactics/puzzle, even SF struggles with some puzzles that a human would solve. Some puzzles seem impossible to solve because they…

@LauOnChess said in #2: > My guess is that 1100's have a blunder/move rate higher than 1500's, but don't necessarily all make the same blunders. When you play against Maia trained on millions of 1100'…

Comments on https://lichess.org/@/jk_182/blog/testing-maias-puzzle-performance/UPmqO0Rg

@Hegens said in #13: > Can anyone explain the accuracy graphs please? I dont quite get the x and y axes. The x-axis shows the accuracy, so it goes from 100 (the best move) to 0. The y-axis shows the n…

@Hirogen said in #9: > One stat that would be interesting to see is: very good positions vs points scored from those. > > My impression was that Vidit could have scored much better had he taken the ch…

@Iaxul said in #6: > How about the Women's Candidates? I focused on the open since analysing all these games with LC0 and Stockfish already took multiple hours and I wanted to finish the post at least…

@GnocchiPup said in #4: > Great post as always. > > Would be good to see the better equal worse graph normalized(?) at 40 moves. I thought about showing the percentages, which would have made the comp…

Comments on https://lichess.org/@/jk_182/blog/the-candidates-in-12-graphs/5Ohu1sby

@Fianchiero said in #27: > Thanks for claryfying. But I think I still have a mistake in my calculations. I tried the formula with W=490 and L=488 and my solution is 2737. Do I have to do something wit…