Search "user:WilliamShookspear"

@RoadTo1201 said in #27: > I have pmed you your analysis! It's also available under my studies if anyone's interested. I can't post any more links for another few hours today.

@Adhitya_Raj said in #25: > I am pming you the analysis now :)

@Akbar2thegreat said in #23: > @WilliamShookspear > I can understand what you are saying but this is considered as kind of advertising since its a public forum. It was better to make a team for game a…

I will get back to it in the morning, it is quite late here. Thanks for the incoming games, I think with your help I am starting to get the hang of this :)

@Aviraldwivedi said in #16: > @WilliamShookspear You forgot to paste the link of the study,so here it is > You were right in saying that I have potential to reach 2100, actually I am about 2100 at pre…

@chronicalien said in #13: > Looks like I can't post any more links today. I'll pm you my analysis :)

@Aviraldwivedi said in #12: > Here's the analysis for this game. Quite interesting game, you definitely had chances!

@j2009 said in #4: > > > My opponent was 1700+(Std) and I am 1075 (Std) > > I am White this was 15+10 game played on tornelo.com it was my state championship Here it is, sorry it took a while: https:/…

@royalblue04 said in #9: > Only a quick look: Instead of 20. g4 you can play 20. f4. Threatening g4, gaining control over e5. On first sight i think white is clearly better. The only reason why i don'…

@E_cahill said in #3: > https://lichess.org/study/xQSU3vR9/jpF5yys4 Hope this was somewhat helpful for you, if you have any questions or comments feel free to let me know :)