Search "user:PARTHISTHEBEST"

@Akbar2thegreat said in #42: > Not fully correct. > With their own knowledge that they learnt before, if players were to be teleported to different era, then yes, it would be bit tough for Pele's team…

@Akbar2thegreat said in #36: > That's just mere assumption. But it is true... Look and compare the different teams - Pele carried the 1960s Brazil Team. They did not have any other world-class players…

@Waiting4BirnamWood said in #31: > This view may be controversial, but it's logical. Football has become much more professional in the last two or three decades (speed, tactics, nutrition, video analy…

@Akbar2thegreat said in #26: > Pele would be an outlier in present time: he would simply crush any player even the likes of Zidane, Ronaldinho, Neymar, Messi, Ronaldo, etc. > And dude, Golden Boot is …

Oh ok

@RishikaChess2012 said in #18: > depends if you live on argentina or portugal This isn't Messi vs Ronaldo, it is who is the GOAT of football, so that makes no difference...

@QQblindfold said in #16: > As a wise man once said, “attackers win you games, defenders win you titles.” > Therefor, lev Yashin is the most influential person on the pitch, basically a one man army. …

@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #8: > Xavi was awesome yeah, but Haaland's stats are just so over-the-top crazy. > > Haaland is quickest player to score 30 goals in the UCL, has the all-time goal scoring r…

@Waiting4BirnamWood said in #11: > The title should provoke. I find that these GOAT debates are a bit narrow at times and underestimate players like Xavi. (But that doesn't mean that I think players l…

@Akbar2thegreat said in #9: And out of nowhere he took Xavi name. Total randomness that makes no sense. Valid...