| Game analysis - Does anybody know what just happened?#3 f6 the losing move as usual. | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - My game#3 3.. h6!? interesting never seen that before. But apperently it has been played on GM level. 4.. Bc6 looks somewhat weird, like black is mixing two systems. 5. d3?! c3 was the way to go taking advatage… | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - Tal temptation#8 3.. g6? is bad. | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - My luckiest win (against 2300+ classical)#9 7. f4 feels wrong. | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - Advice on this game?#10 7. Bc3?! Blocking the c-pawn. 17. Qd1?! going backwards for no reason. 30. Bxd5?! Giving up the bishop pair. White probably reduces his winning chances greatly by this. | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - Analysis Please#11 Or what should have been the losing move rather. | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - Analysis Please#10 10 d5?! good idea counter attacking in the center when faced with an attack a flank. 10. exd5? opening up the e-file for white with check. 11. Be7?? the losing move. | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - My best game so far...can you find my two inacuracies without using an engine?#13 5. g3? too slow 5.. f5?! weird and probably bad. 9. qd3?! wrong plan 10. c4? walking into Bh6 11. Ne5? losing by force. | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - My scandinavian defense game#9 7. Ng5!? interesting, quite the rare idea. 8. Bf4?!. Looks weird, the bishop seems to not be doing anything on f4 10.. g5? weakening, only to chase a bishop that was already not ideally placed, neglec… | xeroxx |
| Game analysis - Attacking Game#3 I guess we'll never find out. | xeroxx |
| Next |
|---|