Dear Lichess,
Even though the Arena format of tournaments is great for large bullet and blitz tournaments, it leads to very undesirable results for smaller groups and/or longer time controls.
If the groups are small, chances are you'll be playing the same players a lot, simply because they've finished their game at the same time you did.
And if the time controls are longer, actually using your time is a poor strategy. If you want to win, you'll have to play as many games as possible in the alotted time. Which is just silly when you're playing rapid or classical time controls.
Now that we're in the midst of the Corona crisis, many regular chess club players are now signing up to be able to play each other, same with my club. We organize small tournaments to play each other, but playing - say - a closed rapid tournament with 25 players is just a very strange way to play a tournament.
So long story short, my suggestion is: add different types of tournaments. Swiss, round-robin, stuff like that.
Even though the Arena format of tournaments is great for large bullet and blitz tournaments, it leads to very undesirable results for smaller groups and/or longer time controls.
If the groups are small, chances are you'll be playing the same players a lot, simply because they've finished their game at the same time you did.
And if the time controls are longer, actually using your time is a poor strategy. If you want to win, you'll have to play as many games as possible in the alotted time. Which is just silly when you're playing rapid or classical time controls.
Now that we're in the midst of the Corona crisis, many regular chess club players are now signing up to be able to play each other, same with my club. We organize small tournaments to play each other, but playing - say - a closed rapid tournament with 25 players is just a very strange way to play a tournament.
So long story short, my suggestion is: add different types of tournaments. Swiss, round-robin, stuff like that.