@LondonsFinest
ah it does suck cause [insert missing explanation here, which low-time-control-noobs cannot provide]?
great to hear that.
ah it does suck cause [insert missing explanation here, which low-time-control-noobs cannot provide]?
great to hear that.
<Comment deleted by user>
i was just wondering what the point was @Cedur216
the point is knowing to manage time in order to accelerate decision making. if it takes me half a decade to concoct some awful move, there is a problem. besides the fact that rapid ratings are completely inflated
it is funny how you played way more bullet than blitz but still complain. and apart from that 500 of your games are won on clock flag, so no need to defend positional play here
it is funny how you played way more bullet than blitz but still complain. and apart from that 500 of your games are won on clock flag, so no need to defend positional play here
you blink you lose that is not chess
correct only a classical player who plays a whole game in the first 2 minutes and pretends he knows how to thoroughly analyze a game, could blink for 15 seconds
blink lose 3 secs and as you premove you lose time
"as you premove you lose time"
no you don't.
and if you still insist that if you blink you lose 3 secs i would
a) seek medical assistance
b) play blindfolded.problem resolved
no you don't.
and if you still insist that if you blink you lose 3 secs i would
a) seek medical assistance
b) play blindfolded.problem resolved
a provisional 2000 plays against a provisional 1500 in antichess ultra bullet rated. 2000 loses because of the dumb time.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.