lichess.org
Donate

CrazyHouse is crazy af!

White cannot win that endgame, but black obviously can (as demonstrated) so it's not an automatic draw.

If you're not interested in trying to flag your opponent in a drawn endgame, you can always offer a draw.
Hilarious! :D
White has to force a stalemate to get his draw.

I got a question, too: How is it possible to use the board editor for a variants game?
It would be interesting what the evaluation would be for a "horde" setting starting out from the standard position with a missing king for one side.
@Mollus Notice that Stockfish for Horde doesn't evaluate quite in the same way as SF for classical, e.g. pawn structure is not evaluated the same, there is a bonus to black for getting to the first rank, etc. I'm not sure which engine is loaded in the "from position" `/variant` analysis board, but you may get weird evals for that reason.

I remember trying to set up a horde position _with_ a white king, with classical rules (so both mates being possible), but couldn't due to pawns not being allowed on the first rank I think. Using @Vempele's trick works it seems : lichess.org/analysis/rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/1PP2PP1/PPPPPPPP/PPPPPPPP/PPPPPPPP/PPPPKPPP_w_kq_-_0_1
(Notice here that the classical engine is used and says -15 but if you play it out as a horde game you can in fact win the game as white.)
Good addition @lecw you are right. I'm surprised Stockfish does not refuse to analyze your position because with the white king it is obvious an impossible horde position and with the pawn on the back rank it's the same for standard. (I know that my position is also impossible, but not obviously for the engine)
It appears your position is as far as you can call it a "standard" game, Stockfish "standard" doesn't seem to have a problem with pawns on the 1th rank.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.