@Loosy said in #60:
> You said much more than that before. So, I take it as an inventive way to say "I was wrong and I retract everything I previously said"!
>
> I never stop learning from you, mate!
just because you insist.
Qassams can't hit farther than 16 km; a good percentage of the rockets hamas fires on Israel had a way larger range (tel aviv, bnei brack, petach tikva, jerusalm,bheit shemesh, ect.).
I had no intention of arguing with you about whether Hamas uses qassams or if they have more advanced rockets.
because, as I said before, It doesn't matter.
You are welcome.
and because im an adult i know the fact that you were wrong about the exclusivity of Hamas use of Qassams does not invalidate everything you said before. so i, as opposed to you, won't make useless illogical sarcastic comment about the fact that if you were wrong on that fact and you said so many thing everything you said is false.
i wish i could say the same. mate!
> You said much more than that before. So, I take it as an inventive way to say "I was wrong and I retract everything I previously said"!
>
> I never stop learning from you, mate!
just because you insist.
Qassams can't hit farther than 16 km; a good percentage of the rockets hamas fires on Israel had a way larger range (tel aviv, bnei brack, petach tikva, jerusalm,bheit shemesh, ect.).
I had no intention of arguing with you about whether Hamas uses qassams or if they have more advanced rockets.
because, as I said before, It doesn't matter.
You are welcome.
and because im an adult i know the fact that you were wrong about the exclusivity of Hamas use of Qassams does not invalidate everything you said before. so i, as opposed to you, won't make useless illogical sarcastic comment about the fact that if you were wrong on that fact and you said so many thing everything you said is false.
i wish i could say the same. mate!