Hi Everyone!
@ChangeOpening has done much for the Antichess community and will always be one of its leaders regardless because of his continued commitment and role in building up its foundations. So, this is a valuable opportunity to allow another individual to implement his ideas. Since both @usewaxlips and @Agburanar have unique ideas, if they were to have some time, their contributions would improve and not just maintain our community; I'm not sure how their availability looks, though. Since this will replace the previous leadership, I'm wondering why we're only voting for two leaders, unlike the committee of 6 or so members we had in the past. If we try to vote for new individuals, it's really risky if they're one of only two members for a term of five years...
@ChangeOpening has done much for the Antichess community and will always be one of its leaders regardless because of his continued commitment and role in building up its foundations. So, this is a valuable opportunity to allow another individual to implement his ideas. Since both @usewaxlips and @Agburanar have unique ideas, if they were to have some time, their contributions would improve and not just maintain our community; I'm not sure how their availability looks, though. Since this will replace the previous leadership, I'm wondering why we're only voting for two leaders, unlike the committee of 6 or so members we had in the past. If we try to vote for new individuals, it's really risky if they're one of only two members for a term of five years...
