lichess.org
Donate

In analysis, missing a mat in 1 counts as a mistake

I am not the best player around town, but to me, missing a mat in 1 must count as a ultimate blunder in a game where the sole objective is to mat the other side. The game I am referencing is this one: lichess.org/vIswkCrc/black#54 move 28 for white.
I guess it's just a mistake because even after 28. Qd6+ the game is still unbelievebly winning for white. I would consider making a move a winning position equal or equal position losing a blunder. This is just from winning in one move to winning in a couple of moves.
It's not a personal message. They have to program rules that a computer program can evaluate, that work for every game/position. The rules are as good, or very close to as good, as any rules could be.

It's a way to draw your attention to a move.

As the person above says after you look at it, you can consider it as important or unimportant as you wish.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.