You use someone's site, you follow their rules. They say stop, you stop. "But I pay..but this should happen..you should do that..i only use a tiny, tiny bit of cpu.." That's nice - thank you for your opinion. I'll just put it over there with all the other opinions.
Not your site. This is open source. Pay someone to set up your own server with their source and do whatever you want with it. Can't be bothered? Fine - so I guess you're stuck with this site's rules then.
I added some code to prevent this kind of game from being created:
github.com/ornicar/lila/commit/5fa5bdea2abf14e63b4348c42c2a72e19370cc68#diff-13e69b67b3fae9a5da7b33082e20059fR309If you wish to make a lichess clone that allows these games, just revert that commit.
I also re-opened your account. Have good games
And this, kids, is what you get when you complain too much to Daddy that you are not allowed to watch TV all night: Now you can't even watch TV during daytime.
Well played.
@ProfDrHack "Well played" - lol, I like it
#43 You are right!Everything must have limits and number of played ultrabullet games against Stockfish must be limited because we play with Stockfish to improve our chess knowledge,not to just waste our time by playing ultrabullet from position and trying to "flag" the non-human opponent.That does not make much sense at all.
So someone who names his account "chesstroll", decides to troll the website on purpose only to waste resources, and then gets offended when he gets banned for being a troll?
It's like those videos where a kid is poking a cat over and over and over, and then when the cat has finally had enough and attacks the kid, the kid starts crying and runs to mom complaining that the cat attacked him.
Anyway, thibault is showing great maturity here - I can imagine it's hard to keep your cool around such trolls sometimes, but he found a civil solution that should even please the troll.
Thank you so very much everyone who supported my position!
For those who misunderstand what has happened, here it is. No one of those who blindly went against me bothered to research the problem.
1. I haven't played 29 000 such games.
I have played about 2650 such games for the last year (other 2650 were not played, because this training is made only for one side [chess color]). Other 23700 games have been just usual games against Stockfish 1. Is it forbidden to play Stockfish 1 in ultrabullet?
So for the last year I've been playing on average 7.26 such games a day.
Enough to close my account?
A game against Stockfish 1 lasts about 30 seconds, which is 7.26*30 = 218
218/60 = 3 minutes 38 seconds.
So I was banned for playing random positions against Stockfish 4 minutes a day!
2. When I received Thibault's message, I thought it was a joke. He didn't say "This is a bannable offense what you do, please stop", he said "Just stop". I don't know Thibault and therefore couldn't figure out was it serious or not, but I wasn't even considering that it could be bannable.
As I've said I've been playing on average 7 random games against Stockfish a day for the last year.
So, if playing 7 such games a day and then reacting negatively to it is enough to deserve all your hatred, from people who don't even bother to research that I have played only 2650 (for a year) such games, and not 29 000, then OK, that just shows your human nature.
You don't even make your own research, you just reiterate what people in power here said previously. Now, inferring from that, your opinions seem not so much based on your own sense of what is right and what is wrong, but rather biased and formed by what people you adore or admire dictate.
Which is upsetting, unintelligent and distasteful.
It's very simple really. You got a warning. You ignored the warning. You got banned. Quick maths. After the problem was fixed you were lucky enough to get unbanned. I wouldn't try to push that luck any further.
Tip: The more arrogant/"edgy"/whiny your post, the lower your chances that your position will be heard.
If expressing my position is pushing luck, then it's fine, I'm ready to be banned for this.
