Moscow terror attack

@what_game_is_this said in #9:
> Another thing, it's funny that Russia say that the terrorists was moving towards the Ukraine border.
>
> It it is easy to cross it it means either:
>
> Russian forces on the border colluded with the terrorists.
>
> or
>
> The Russian forces are grossly incompetent.
>
> or
>
> Both.

Lol, you have Russia which has thousands of miles of unguarded border with Khazakhstan and Mongolia and they chose to try and go to one of the most heavily guarded in the world with only one crossing that's extremely high security? So believable....Russia is so desperate to put their spin on it

They simply were told to go in that direction. Who cares about terrorists after they did their things? On the other hand, Ukraine of all Russia's neighbours could accept them.

@Aluminium-27 said in #12:
> They simply were told to go in that direction. Who cares about terrorists after they did their things? On the other hand, Ukraine of all Russia's neighbours could accept them.
Absurd. Ukraine would above all not want to be associated with ISIS. Otherwise the support from the West could very well come to an end.

What's the subject in this forum? What "Moscow terror attack" is being talked about?

@WassimBerbar open your favourite news channel, the answer should not be too hard to find.

@Aluminium-27 said in #12:
> They simply were told to go in that direction. Who cares about terrorists after they did their things? On the other hand, Ukraine of all Russia's neighbours could accept them.
Yes I'm sure they would just sail right through the single border crossing teeming with Russian security lmao. They weren't that stupid. To carry out an attack like that, required a lot of finesse unfortunately so insane, inhumane, sure ... but not stupid

@Under-the-radar said in #13:
> Absurd. Ukraine would above all not want to be associated with ISIS. Otherwise the support from the West could very well come to an end.

ISIS is a potential ally for Ukraine as Russia's enemy, regardless of their public relationships. Is Ukraine so desperate to ally with terrorists? Maybe some people there are. We'll never know. I personally think that terrorists weren't supposed to escape at all.

@Under-the-radar said in #15:
> @WassimBerbar open your favourite news channel, the answer should not be too hard to find.
First results yield this: www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/3/23/isil-says-it-was-behind-moscow-concert-hall-attack-that-killed-at-least-60

I haven't heard of this lately, questionable why they would do this.

@Aluminium-27 said in #17:
> ISIS is a potential ally for Ukraine as Russia's enemy, regardless of their public relationships. Is Ukraine so desperate to ally with terrorists? Maybe some people there are. We'll never know. I personally think that terrorists weren't supposed to escape at all.
Yes, I got your point the first time. I maintain it's absurd.

Obviously NATO is a WAY more valuable ally than ISIS.
And obviously you can't have both. If words gets out Ukraine allies with ISIS, every NATO country would immediately walk away. And I would think Ukraine dirigeant have enough basic common sense to realise that.

@Under-the-radar said in #19:
> Yes, I got your point the first time. I maintain it's absurd.
>
> Obviously NATO is a WAY more valuable ally than ISIS.
> And obviously you can't have both. If words gets out Ukraine allies with ISIS, every NATO country would immediately walk away. And I would think Ukraine dirigeant have enough basic common sense to realise that.

NATO is going to leave Ukraine for one incident? No way.