The first question is self-explanatory, asking if puzzles that more people have downvoted (as "bad") than upvoted should be removed from the puzzle pool. My vote is yes, after a period of time for sufficient voting has occurred.
The second one is also pretty self-explanatory, though I think if it were to work it would have to be opt-in, and perhaps include only those puzzles generated after a certain amount of moves have been played (this would make it more like "normal" chess, and therefore more acceptable to larger numbers of users).
Question for the non-960 players out there, would you like 960 puzzles to be included to increase variety? If so, after how many moves would you feel comfortable having 960 puzzles in your puzzle pool?
The second one is also pretty self-explanatory, though I think if it were to work it would have to be opt-in, and perhaps include only those puzzles generated after a certain amount of moves have been played (this would make it more like "normal" chess, and therefore more acceptable to larger numbers of users).
Question for the non-960 players out there, would you like 960 puzzles to be included to increase variety? If so, after how many moves would you feel comfortable having 960 puzzles in your puzzle pool?