lichess.org
Donate

i dont believe in god

@tixem75 said in #9:
> Why can't animal think rationally by itself? Why do only human have this ability?

This is plainly wrong. See this crow from New Zealand in a famous experiment:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gui3IswQ0DI

> Did you know that your immunity system has the resistance ability to every possible bacteria in this universe?

That's just a laughable claim when you even don't know which bacteria exists on other planets. BTW: Have you heard of the natives of Middle/South America dying in the thousands from illnesses that the european conquerers of the Middle Ages brought with them and that were unknown to the immune system of the Incas, the Aztecs and so on? These were bacteria and viruses not from a solar system in the Andromeda galaxy but from Earth itself.

> Because it has a atmosphere that protects you from harmful UV rays of sun. It has water to drink, animals and plant to eat, and every useful resources we need to survive for everyone. What do you think who gave us all of that?

Hydrogen and Oxygen - which together form water - belong to the three most abundant elements in our universe so it is no mystery why you find a lot of water on Earth.

And animals and plants didn't come from an invisible man in the sky but from evolution. BTW: The young Earth wouldn't have been hospitable neither for us nor for any other land animal. If billions of years ago cyanobacteria hadn't produced Oxygen as waste product there wouldn't even be lifeforms being able to use it as a means to power their metabolism. And how did life develop this feat? Again not from the machinations of an invisible man in the sky but by evolution.

> Earth is in the perfect zone in solar system. Not closer not farther. How come a planet set itself in such accuracy by itself?

Yeah, how comes that we live on such a planet which offers the right conditions for our survival? Answer: Because life wouldn't have effing developed here if the Earth was a hot Jupiter!

The arguments of the Intelligent Design addicts always amaze me.
@TCF_Namelecc said in #27:
> To be fair, Occam’s Razor applies
Wow. How many blades does it have?
Or is it rather the 11th commandment?
Occam's 'razor' means nothing.
Worse still, it will become a tool to the blind:
"Ooh, it's complicated, blasphemy! blasphemy!"
But they don't know what the piñata they're talking about.
@Katzenschinken said in #31:
> This is plainly wrong. See this crow from New Zealand in a famous experiment:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That's just a laughable claim when you even don't know which bacteria exists on other planets. BTW: Have you heard of the natives of Middle/South America dying in the thousands from illnesses that the european conquerers of the Middle Ages brought with them and that were unknown to the immune system of the Incas, the Aztecs and so on? These were bacteria and viruses not from a solar system in the Andromeda galaxy but from Earth itself.
>
>
>
> Hydrogen and Oxygen - which together form water - belong to the three most abundant elements in our universe so it is no mystery why you find a lot of water on Earth.
>
> And animals and plants didn't come from an invisible man in the sky but from evolution. BTW: The young Earth wouldn't have been hospitable neither for us nor for any other land animal. If billions of years ago cyanobacteria hadn't produced Oxygen as waste product there wouldn't even be lifeforms being able to use it as a means to power their metabolism. And how did life develop this feat? Again not from the machinations of an invisible man in the sky but by evolution.
>
>
>
> Yeah, how comes that we live on such a planet which offers the right conditions for our survival? Answer: Because life wouldn't have effing developed here if the Earth was a hot Jupiter!
>
> The arguments of the Intelligent Design addicts always amaze me.

nice refutation keep it up
@tixem75 said in #29:
> Explain morality scientifically

The concept of reciprocity is used not only by humans but also by a lot of other species. Why? Because it is an evolutionary advantage not to be at each others throats for a small advantage.

Book tip: "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins.
Why are God and science mutually exclusive? Mendel, Copernicus, and Lemaître were all Catholic priests, as was William of Ockham—whose razor has been referenced quite a bit in this thread.

I can understand why someone might not believe in any god(s), but I have never understood the argument for science disproving the existence of god. The concept of an omnipotent, omniscient being who is trying to remain undetected is fundamentally impossible to disprove.
And btw Richard Dawkins has been refuted many times

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.