When displaying average centipawn loss by date, and filtering for the last 6 months, I have the following odd behaviour:
When further filtering for variant and enabling/disabling blitz and correspondence, the displayed average centipawn values are highest when enabling both Blitz and correspondence.
The average should settle between the averages of Blitz and Correspondence but not exceed both. Or am I math-blundering here?
When further filtering for variant and enabling/disabling blitz and correspondence, the displayed average centipawn values are highest when enabling both Blitz and correspondence.
The average should settle between the averages of Blitz and Correspondence but not exceed both. Or am I math-blundering here?