Jeez, what a goofy thread title: "Excuse me, excuse me--I have an important announcement to make!..."
Yes! Sombody please get Hamas out of the hospitals and schools in Gaza!
@h_heller said in #48:
> they have Solid-propellant rocket. Qassam is an old news.
You seem well informed on this. But, to make sure I follow you; you're saying that the Palestinians now have solid-propellant rockets, right? Google says that Qassam is also solid-propellant. So far, so good.
And you're saying that those ones consume 4.000.000 times as much as Qassam, if I understand correct, right? Can you please confirm this?
Finally, is it also possible to time-travel on these machines, or they are suitable only for heating hospitals?
> they have Solid-propellant rocket. Qassam is an old news.
You seem well informed on this. But, to make sure I follow you; you're saying that the Palestinians now have solid-propellant rockets, right? Google says that Qassam is also solid-propellant. So far, so good.
And you're saying that those ones consume 4.000.000 times as much as Qassam, if I understand correct, right? Can you please confirm this?
Finally, is it also possible to time-travel on these machines, or they are suitable only for heating hospitals?
@Loosy said in #53:
> You seem well informed on this. But, to make sure I follow you; you're saying that the Palestinians now have solid-propellant rockets, right? Google says that Qassam is also solid-propellant. So far, so good.
>
> And you're saying that those ones consume 4.000.000 times as much as Qassam, if I understand correct, right? Can you please confirm this?
>
> Finally, is it also possible to time-travel on these machines, or they are suitable only for heating hospitals?
as i said before, and i'm quoting myself
@h_heller said in #21:
> actually this conversation is meaningless. even if they didn't have anything to use. israel has no moral obligation to provide now fuel to gaza. hamas wants his citizens to have electricity? he needs to set free the hostages.
> hamas doesnt want buildings to be destroyed? he should stop placing his headquarters in apartment buildings
a week ago thousands terrorists invaded Israel, they took over viliges, kibutzim and cities and murdered the civiliens, police forces and soldiers there. declaration a of war.
it was'nt some spontanic individualistic attack.
what did they think israel will do? say. 'ho, but if we will bomb gaza probably also civilians will die because hamas never separates its "military" forces from the civilians .. so lets just sit here, let them celebrate the murder and the kidnapps and wait for the next well planed war'.
even now when IDF are planing on purging the northern Gaza Strip from Hamas and to minimize the killing of civilians Hamas is telling the civilians that this is psychological warfare and that they should stay there. to make it impossible for the IDF forced to fight the hamas without killing civilians on the way.
> You seem well informed on this. But, to make sure I follow you; you're saying that the Palestinians now have solid-propellant rockets, right? Google says that Qassam is also solid-propellant. So far, so good.
>
> And you're saying that those ones consume 4.000.000 times as much as Qassam, if I understand correct, right? Can you please confirm this?
>
> Finally, is it also possible to time-travel on these machines, or they are suitable only for heating hospitals?
as i said before, and i'm quoting myself
@h_heller said in #21:
> actually this conversation is meaningless. even if they didn't have anything to use. israel has no moral obligation to provide now fuel to gaza. hamas wants his citizens to have electricity? he needs to set free the hostages.
> hamas doesnt want buildings to be destroyed? he should stop placing his headquarters in apartment buildings
a week ago thousands terrorists invaded Israel, they took over viliges, kibutzim and cities and murdered the civiliens, police forces and soldiers there. declaration a of war.
it was'nt some spontanic individualistic attack.
what did they think israel will do? say. 'ho, but if we will bomb gaza probably also civilians will die because hamas never separates its "military" forces from the civilians .. so lets just sit here, let them celebrate the murder and the kidnapps and wait for the next well planed war'.
even now when IDF are planing on purging the northern Gaza Strip from Hamas and to minimize the killing of civilians Hamas is telling the civilians that this is psychological warfare and that they should stay there. to make it impossible for the IDF forced to fight the hamas without killing civilians on the way.
@h_heller said in #54:
> as i said before, and i'm quoting myself
>
>
>
> a week ago thousands terrorists invaded Israel, they took over viliges, kibutzim and cities and murdered the civiliens, police forces and soldiers there. declaration a of war.
> it was'nt some spontanic individualistic attack.
> what did they think israel will do? say. 'ho, but if we will bomb gaza probably also civilians will die because hamas never separates its "military" forces from the civilians .. so lets just sit here, let them celebrate the murder and the kidnapps and wait for the next well planed war'.
>
> even now when IDF are planing on purging the northern Gaza Strip from Hamas and to minimize the killing of civilians Hamas is telling the civilians that this is psychological warfare and that they should stay there. to make it impossible for the IDF forced to fight the hamas without killing civilians on the way.
Of course, we must not forget the hundreds of "innocent" citizens who participated in the attack, robbed property, burned houses and cars, raped and even murdered and kidnapped and Hamas confirmed that there are hostages that civilians kidnapped and even claim that the children who were raped and murdered are only civilians and not Hamas which is of course a lie but it is certain that they are involved
> as i said before, and i'm quoting myself
>
>
>
> a week ago thousands terrorists invaded Israel, they took over viliges, kibutzim and cities and murdered the civiliens, police forces and soldiers there. declaration a of war.
> it was'nt some spontanic individualistic attack.
> what did they think israel will do? say. 'ho, but if we will bomb gaza probably also civilians will die because hamas never separates its "military" forces from the civilians .. so lets just sit here, let them celebrate the murder and the kidnapps and wait for the next well planed war'.
>
> even now when IDF are planing on purging the northern Gaza Strip from Hamas and to minimize the killing of civilians Hamas is telling the civilians that this is psychological warfare and that they should stay there. to make it impossible for the IDF forced to fight the hamas without killing civilians on the way.
Of course, we must not forget the hundreds of "innocent" citizens who participated in the attack, robbed property, burned houses and cars, raped and even murdered and kidnapped and Hamas confirmed that there are hostages that civilians kidnapped and even claim that the children who were raped and murdered are only civilians and not Hamas which is of course a lie but it is certain that they are involved
@kagamisama said in #50:
> If your family gets killed because there are some hamas guys in the area, i'm sure you'll be the first one saying "this was justified because of the rome statute and international humanitarian law."
Of course I won't say it but does that make it wrong? Even if I were a relative of a terrorist who murdered Israeli children, I would say that it is not justified to kill my relative, but does that make it right? What does it matter what I would say if I were in that situation?
> If your family gets killed because there are some hamas guys in the area, i'm sure you'll be the first one saying "this was justified because of the rome statute and international humanitarian law."
Of course I won't say it but does that make it wrong? Even if I were a relative of a terrorist who murdered Israeli children, I would say that it is not justified to kill my relative, but does that make it right? What does it matter what I would say if I were in that situation?
@a4477 said in #55:
> Of course, we must not forget the hundreds of "innocent" citizens who participated in the attack, robbed property, burned houses and cars, raped and even murdered and kidnapped and Hamas confirmed that there are hostages that civilians kidnapped and even claim that the children who were raped and murdered are only civilians and not Hamas which is of course a lie but it is certain that they are involved
yes. but as long as you don't know who it was exactly you can't target everyone just because maybe he was one of them
> Of course, we must not forget the hundreds of "innocent" citizens who participated in the attack, robbed property, burned houses and cars, raped and even murdered and kidnapped and Hamas confirmed that there are hostages that civilians kidnapped and even claim that the children who were raped and murdered are only civilians and not Hamas which is of course a lie but it is certain that they are involved
yes. but as long as you don't know who it was exactly you can't target everyone just because maybe he was one of them
@h_heller said in #57:
> yes. but as long as you don't know who it was exactly you can't target everyone just because maybe he was one of them
I agree with you, I just came to say that a large part and even most of the citizens in Gaza are not so innocent
> yes. but as long as you don't know who it was exactly you can't target everyone just because maybe he was one of them
I agree with you, I just came to say that a large part and even most of the citizens in Gaza are not so innocent
>Human Rights Watch confirmed the use of white phosphorus munitions by Israel, saying such usage "violates the international humanitarian law prohibition on putting civilians at unnecessary risk."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Israel–Hamas_war#By_the_Israeli_government
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Israel–Hamas_war#By_the_Israeli_government
@h_heller said in #54:
> as i said before, and i'm quoting myself
You said much more than that before. So, I take it as an inventive way to say "I was wrong and I retract everything I previously said"!
I never stop learning from you, mate!
> as i said before, and i'm quoting myself
You said much more than that before. So, I take it as an inventive way to say "I was wrong and I retract everything I previously said"!
I never stop learning from you, mate!
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.