What the most controversial opinion you have?

@Katzenschinken said in #80:

> But let me now ask you a question. Doesn't the fact that nothing of what you thought to be proof against evolution was really proof make you doubt your own beliefs about evolution?

No, wait. I see you didn't got what I meant so wait a bit until I explain... Which I'm sorry, but it'll probably be tomorrow. Not other reason but I'm just sick and I don't wanna stay up late again. Sorry

Ok, sooo....

@Katzenschinken I just researched and according to google the moon is 4.53 billion years old. Since there's a lot of dust flowing in space, fro these 4.53 billion years a lot of dust should have been collected there. But when the first astronaut lands there the dust happens to be as much as it could be collected for maximum 8,000 years.

About the rings of Saturn, they get more and more farther from the planet with time. But they're too close to have been doing this for as long as according to evolution the planet is probably aged

So that was about these too.

Anyway, I would leave the argue soon.

@EnBeeTea said in #82:
> I just researched and according to google the moon is 4.53 billion years old. Since there's a lot of dust flowing in space, fro these 4.53 billion years a lot of dust should have been collected there. But when the first astronaut lands there the dust happens to be as much as it could be collected for maximum 8,000 years.

Do you have a source for that?

> About the rings of Saturn, they get more and more farther from the planet with time. But they're too close to have been doing this for as long as according to evolution the planet is probably aged

Again, do you have a source for this?

@Katzenschinken said in #84:
> Do you have a source for that?

> Again, do you have a source for this?

I didn't made them up by myself if that's what you mean.

No, that was not what I meant. But I want to read more about how the people who initially made this claim came to their conclusions.

Uhh.... Paper. I got one of them from a book by Dennis R. Peterson. I love it because it's full facts and arguments disproving the theory of Darwin. But I think you could research about him on the internet.