@dimkadimon said in #2:
> How strong is it against other chess engines?
You can check
- ongoing tournaments like www.chess.com/ccc or tcec-chess.com/ , or
- rating lists like www.sp-cc.de/ , ipmanchess.yolasite.com/ or computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/
Note that it may take some time for rating lists to test Stockfish 16.1
@O12938475665 said in #4:
> Image shows "Stockfish 17". Intentional?
Yes, because it's the development progress of Stockfish 17.
Even after minor releases (like 16.1), progression tests will still be made against Stockfish 16.
@Kingscrusher-YouTube said in #8:
> Hi there, great work
>
> I was just wondering if just 1 thread as a parameter is not enabled anymore?!
>
> Cheers, K
You can still use Stockfish with 1 thread:
> option name Threads type spin default 1 min 1 max 1024
Lichess for their website decided to disable that option because:
> due to the nature of how pthreads and web workers work together in lila-stockfish-web, running with a single thread can actually cause errors
> How strong is it against other chess engines?
You can check
- ongoing tournaments like www.chess.com/ccc or tcec-chess.com/ , or
- rating lists like www.sp-cc.de/ , ipmanchess.yolasite.com/ or computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/
Note that it may take some time for rating lists to test Stockfish 16.1
@O12938475665 said in #4:
> Image shows "Stockfish 17". Intentional?
Yes, because it's the development progress of Stockfish 17.
Even after minor releases (like 16.1), progression tests will still be made against Stockfish 16.
@Kingscrusher-YouTube said in #8:
> Hi there, great work
>
> I was just wondering if just 1 thread as a parameter is not enabled anymore?!
>
> Cheers, K
You can still use Stockfish with 1 thread:
> option name Threads type spin default 1 min 1 max 1024
Lichess for their website decided to disable that option because:
> due to the nature of how pthreads and web workers work together in lila-stockfish-web, running with a single thread can actually cause errors
