sorry people for my outpouring. i have been looking for mathematically inclined lichess users that could take chess seriously as object of modelling or at least curious about such things, while being able to criticize it too, in good faith and search for more information (some would say truth, i say truth improvement, more reasonable).
And that user, even if partially nit picking (by own admission) did seem to have a solid construct in live memory of something i find lacking in all chess related mathematics and engine technology seen so far but for neural networks technology underlying math framework (not necessary for correct implementation, but perhaps important for improvement of the technology and interpretation of engine as measure instruments in chess.. Topology. Even if skeptical of my propositions, I could with discussion adjust my language if that user had curiosity. so i had to overshare for at least providing enough material for that user curiosity and judgment toward further discussions.
This is a rare opportunity, I had. That is high jacking for my own needs. i apologize.. but do not regret.
And that user, even if partially nit picking (by own admission) did seem to have a solid construct in live memory of something i find lacking in all chess related mathematics and engine technology seen so far but for neural networks technology underlying math framework (not necessary for correct implementation, but perhaps important for improvement of the technology and interpretation of engine as measure instruments in chess.. Topology. Even if skeptical of my propositions, I could with discussion adjust my language if that user had curiosity. so i had to overshare for at least providing enough material for that user curiosity and judgment toward further discussions.
This is a rare opportunity, I had. That is high jacking for my own needs. i apologize.. but do not regret.