Very nice techniques to help with a challenging piece of improvement. Thanks
Uh, I've always known "blunder check" as a term for cheating in correspondence games by using a computer chess engine to ensure that the move one is about to transmit is not a blunder before doing so. (This is back in the day when it was universal that using engines in correspondence was cheating.) As in a player saying, "I only use Fritz to blunder check," which is a direct quote from someone I knew over a decade ago. I've never heard the term actually used as part of the computation process, even as I've heard the advice to absolutely check no pieces are hanging and there are no mates-in-one against you before moving.
I already have a 2542 task rating. But I think it’s more useful to solve problems using books
у меня 3211
@Timur_chess-2012 said in #14:
> I already have a 2542 task rating. But I think it’s more useful to solve problems using books
> I already have a 2542 task rating. But I think it’s more useful to solve problems using books
@Rodion_2015 said in #16:
> @Timur_chess-2012 сказал в #14:
@Rodion_2015 said in #15:
> у меня 3211
@Timur_chess-2012 said in #14:
> У меня уже рейтинг задач 2542. Но я считаю, что полезнее решать задачи с помощью книг.
@southernrun said in #12:
> Очень хорошие методы, которые помогут в сложном улучшении. Спасибо
@Timur_chess-2012 said in #12:
> у меня задачи 2115
> @Timur_chess-2012 сказал в #14:
@Rodion_2015 said in #15:
> у меня 3211
@Timur_chess-2012 said in #14:
> У меня уже рейтинг задач 2542. Но я считаю, что полезнее решать задачи с помощью книг.
@southernrun said in #12:
> Очень хорошие методы, которые помогут в сложном улучшении. Спасибо
@Timur_chess-2012 said in #12:
> у меня задачи 2115