If we don't do anything, it will replace jobs and we will be lazy, relying on ChatGPT, causing us to be dumber. While itself remove bad words and said nothing about war, if someone copy its code and remove it's filter, we are in danger...
@natbee56 what exactly are we in danger of?
@jdwhite42 said in #42:
> natbee56 what exactly are we in danger of?
AI could spread misinformation through spam or deepfakes.
AI could inadvertently perpetuate harmful beliefs by being supportive.
AI could replace the customer support industry.
> natbee56 what exactly are we in danger of?
AI could spread misinformation through spam or deepfakes.
AI could inadvertently perpetuate harmful beliefs by being supportive.
AI could replace the customer support industry.
@InkyDarkBird said in #43:
> AI could spread misinformation through spam or deepfakes.
> AI could inadvertently perpetuate harmful beliefs by being supportive.
> AI could replace the customer support industry.
A human can spread misinformation
Humans are supportive
no it wont, I shared above a study that profs that it wont in the next decades
Ai can discover deep fakes, for deep fakes we use generative adversarial neural networks, the first model generates deep fakes, the second tries to identify them and they compeat to try and get better and beat eachother
> AI could spread misinformation through spam or deepfakes.
> AI could inadvertently perpetuate harmful beliefs by being supportive.
> AI could replace the customer support industry.
A human can spread misinformation
Humans are supportive
no it wont, I shared above a study that profs that it wont in the next decades
Ai can discover deep fakes, for deep fakes we use generative adversarial neural networks, the first model generates deep fakes, the second tries to identify them and they compeat to try and get better and beat eachother
@Muzan08 said in #44:
> A human can spread misinformation
Yeah, AI could spread more.
> Humans are supportive
Humans are also toxic.
> no it wont, I shared above a study that profs that it wont in the next decades
ok
> Ai can discover deep fakes, for deep fakes we use generative adversarial neural networks, the first model generates deep fakes, the second tries to identify them and they compeat to try and get better and beat eachother
And so what if it can discover deepfakes? What if they are spammed all over the place before the AI reaches that technological level?
> A human can spread misinformation
Yeah, AI could spread more.
> Humans are supportive
Humans are also toxic.
> no it wont, I shared above a study that profs that it wont in the next decades
ok
> Ai can discover deep fakes, for deep fakes we use generative adversarial neural networks, the first model generates deep fakes, the second tries to identify them and they compeat to try and get better and beat eachother
And so what if it can discover deepfakes? What if they are spammed all over the place before the AI reaches that technological level?
@InkyDarkBird said in #45:
> And so what if it can discover deepfakes? What if they are spammed all over the place before the AI reaches that technological level?
it already did
> And so what if it can discover deepfakes? What if they are spammed all over the place before the AI reaches that technological level?
it already did
All it seems people are worried about is AI replacing menial jobs that people are forced to work due to artificial scarcity and captialism - fix capitalism and then it becomes a massive benefit.
@salmon_rushdie said in #47:
> All it seems people are worried about is AI replacing menial jobs that people are forced to work due to artificial scarcity and captialism - fix capitalism and then it becomes a massive benefit.
As I said in the previous responses, their compared doctors to AI, AI gave better diagnosis but when combined they gave neer 100% accuracy, or we could just use ensemble learning
And fixing capitalism is not the responsibility of ai developers
> All it seems people are worried about is AI replacing menial jobs that people are forced to work due to artificial scarcity and captialism - fix capitalism and then it becomes a massive benefit.
As I said in the previous responses, their compared doctors to AI, AI gave better diagnosis but when combined they gave neer 100% accuracy, or we could just use ensemble learning
And fixing capitalism is not the responsibility of ai developers
@jdwhite42 said in #42:
> @natbee56 what exactly are we in danger of?
1. Terrorist
2 War(WW3 possible)
Any thing that involve violence
> @natbee56 what exactly are we in danger of?
1. Terrorist
2 War(WW3 possible)
Any thing that involve violence
@natbee56 said in #49:
> 1. Terrorist
> 2 War(WW3 possible)
> Any thing that involve violence
1. I don't see how ChatGPT would influence terrorism
2. Not quite sure what you're getting at here, unless you're thinking along the lines of a robots vs humans war.
3. "anything that involve violence" last I checked, chatgpt could only produce words and had no physical body so unless it's verbal violence, or it suddenly writes an insult about someone, once again I don't see how chatgpt affects this
> 1. Terrorist
> 2 War(WW3 possible)
> Any thing that involve violence
1. I don't see how ChatGPT would influence terrorism
2. Not quite sure what you're getting at here, unless you're thinking along the lines of a robots vs humans war.
3. "anything that involve violence" last I checked, chatgpt could only produce words and had no physical body so unless it's verbal violence, or it suddenly writes an insult about someone, once again I don't see how chatgpt affects this
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.