Comments on https://lichess.org/@/datajunkie/blog/24-book-review-study-chess-with-matthew-sadler/WgVmbT0b
Comments on https://lichess.org/@/datajunkie/blog/24-book-review-study-chess-with-matthew-sadler/WgVmbT0b
Comments on https://lichess.org/@/datajunkie/blog/24-book-review-study-chess-with-matthew-sadler/WgVmbT0b
Crossover plans?
IMHO any book review that doesn't include the target audience in the first paragraph ( e.g GMs & IMs, 1500-2000, under 800) is a useless book review.
@ed01106 said in #3:
IMHO any book review that doesn't include the target audience in the first paragraph ( e.g GMs & IMs, 1500-2000, under 800) is a useless book review.
A rule of thumb. Writers mainly write for themselves. A GM will have GM material.
I felt like the endame was favorable to white so my choice was Bxc4 bxc4 Rd6 with b6 and Kd7 - Kc7 to follow to safely make a draw. But if you want to win then of course you should keep the bishop alive.
@wannabe2700 said in #4:
A rule of thumb. Writers mainly write for themselves. A GM will have GM material.
That is not always true. iMs and GMs often make recommendations for beginners, however now that I think about it, they typically begin those reviews by pointing out the target audience.