[Event "XIII London Classic (1). Londres"] [Date "2023.12.01"] [Round "1"] [White "Adams,M..."] [Black "Tabatabaei,A..."] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2760"] [BlackElo "2694"] [Variant "Standard"] [ECO "C50"] [Opening "Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo, Italian Four Knights Variation"] [StudyName "LENTXO COMENTA"] [ChapterName "Adams,M... - Tabatabaei,A..."] [ChapterURL "https://lichess.org/study/vftFZ6PI/hF6gWI17"] [Annotator "https://lichess.org/@/carvaflu"] [Orientation "white"] { [%evp 14,93,17,11,20,11,24,25,21,17,32,27,31,30,38,32,105,99,128,135,128,107,128,102,190,141,141,136,180,175,299,177,180,173,178,195,299,284,307,297,285,285,275,295,404,403,383,382,378,388,390,384,403,404,413,410,407,415,534,527,574,580,781,757,754,754,703,418,450,448,511,417,505,483,488,469,471,461,460,455,446,431] } 1. e4 { [%eval 0.36] } { Michael Adams, de 52 años, demuestra que ha estudiado a los clásico y que comprende mucho mejor las leyes de la estrategia que su pujante rival, de 22. Apertura Italiana (C50): } 1... e5 { [%eval 0.17] } 2. Nf3 { [%eval 0.29] } 2... Nc6 { [%eval 0.32] } 3. Bc4 { [%eval 0.21] } 3... Nf6 { [%eval 0.29] } 4. d3 { [%eval 0.21] } 4... Bc5 { [%eval 0.09] } 5. Nc3 { [%eval 0.11] } 5... h6 { [%eval 0.13] } 6. O-O { [%eval 0.15] } 6... O-O { [%eval 0.13] } 7. h3 { [%eval 0.0] } 7... d6 { [%eval 0.21] } 8. Na4 { [%eval 0.1] } 8... Bb6 { [%eval 0.04] } { C50: Hungarian Defence and Giuoco Pianissimo. } 9. a3 { [%eval 0.17] } 9... Be6 { [%eval 0.21] } (9... Re8 10. Re1 Be6 { , para retomar en e6 con la torre, So-Carlsen, relámpago, Speed Chess, Chess. com 2023) }) 10. Bxe6 { [%eval 0.18] } 10... fxe6 { [%eval 0.17] } { White has an edge. } 11. c3 { [%eval 0.19] } 11... Qe8 { [%eval 0.19] } 12. b4 { [%eval 0.21] } 12... Ne7 { [%eval 0.21] } 13. Ra2 { [%eval 0.23] } 13... Kh8 $146 { [%eval 0.18] } (13... Nh5 14. Nxb6 axb6 15. g3 b5 16. Kg2 b6 17. Nh2 Nf6 18. Be3 Qc6 19. Bd2 d5 { 0-1 (52) Van Foreest,J (2695)-Giri,A (2772) Utrecht 2023 }) 14. Re1 { [%eval 0.32] } 14... g5?! { [%eval 1.11] } { Inaccuracy. Ng6 was best. } { (un error de concepto difícil de entender en un jugador tan fuerte como Tabatabaei, que roza los 2.700 puntos Elo: debilitar así al propio rey sólo tiene sentido si se ve con claridad que las negras tienen ataque en ese flanco; y no es el caso) } (14... Ng6 15. g3 Kg8 16. Kg2 Ne7 17. d4 Ng6 18. Rae2 Qf7 19. Rc2 Qe8 20. Nb2) 15. d4 $16 { [%eval 1.06] } 15... Ng6?! { [%eval 1.27] } (15... exd4 16. Nxb6 axb6 17. cxd4 d5 (17... Ng6 $16) 18. exd5! Nexd5 { [#] } 19. Qb3! Qa4 20. Qxa4 (20. Qd3 $18) 20... Rxa4 21. Rae2 Nf4 (21... Re8 $16 { was worth a try. } 22. Rxe6 Rxe6 23. Rxe6 Kg7) 22. Bxf4! gxf4 23. Rxe6 Rxa3 24. Rc1 c6? (24... Nd5 { is a better defense. } 25. Rxh6+ Kg7) 25. Ne5 Kg8 { [#] } 26. Re7 { , las blancas tendrían ventaja decisiva) } (26. b5! { [%mdl 512] })) 16. dxe5 { [%eval 1.22] } 16... dxe5 { [%eval 1.34] } 17. Nxb6 { [%eval 1.23] } 17... cxb6 { [%eval 1.29] } 18. c4 { [%eval 1.39] } 18... Qc6 { [%eval 1.82] } (18... g4 $16 { was called for. }) 19. Rc2 { [%eval 1.37] } 19... Rad8 { [%eval 1.46] } 20. Qe2 { [%eval 1.46] } 20... Qa4 { [%eval 1.63] } { (diagrama) } 21. c5! { [%eval 1.75] } { (alguno de los peones negros débiles caerá como fruta madura más temprano que tarde; además, Tabatabaei debe tener cuidado con su enroque débil) } 21... Nh5?! { [%eval 2.85] } { Inaccuracy. Rc8 was best. } (21... Rc8 22. Bb2 Nd7) 22. Rc3?! { [%eval 1.71] } { Inaccuracy. Nxe5 was best. } (22. cxb6 { aiming for Nxe5! } 22... Nhf4 23. Bxf4 Nxf4 24. Qc4) (22. Nxe5 Nxe5 23. Bb2 Kh7 24. Bxe5 Nf4 25. Bxf4 Rxf4 26. cxb6 axb6 27. Rc7+ Rd7 28. Rxd7+ Qxd7) 22... Nhf4 $18 { [%eval 1.66] } 23. Bxf4 { [%eval 1.79] } 23... Nxf4 { [%eval 1.8] } 24. Qe3 { [%eval 1.57] } 24... Rd1?! { [%eval 2.6] } { Inaccuracy. Qd7 was best. } (24... bxc5 25. Qxc5 Kg8) (24... Qd7 25. cxb6) 25. cxb6 { [%eval 2.56] } 25... axb6 { [%eval 2.51] } 26. Kh2 { [%eval 2.6] } (26. Nxe5 Rxe1+ 27. Qxe1 Qb5 $16) 26... Rxe1 { [%eval 2.64] } 27. Qxe1 { [%eval 2.65] } 27... Qd7 { [%eval 2.8] } 28. g3 { [%eval 2.7] } (28. Nxe5 Qg7 $16) 28... Nh5 { [%eval 3.26] } 29. Nxe5 { [%eval 3.31] } { (cumplida la primera parte del plan) } 29... Qg7 { [%eval 3.19] } 30. Rf3 { [%eval 3.1] } 30... Rxf3 { [%eval 3.0] } 31. Nxf3 { [%eval 3.32] } 31... Nf6 { [%eval 3.21] } 32. Qe3 { [%eval 3.41] } 32... Qc7 { [%eval 3.08] } 33. Qd4 { [%eval 3.47] } 33... Kg7 { [%eval 3.53] } 34. Ne5 { [%eval 3.64] } 34... h5 { [%eval 3.85] } 35. Nf3 { [%eval 3.67] } 35... g4?! { [%eval 4.66] } { Inaccuracy. Kg6 was best. } (35... Kg6 36. Qe3 Nh7 37. h4 g4 38. Ng5 Nf8 39. e5 Kg7 40. Qf4 Qe7 41. Qd4 b5 42. Ne4) 36. hxg4?! { [%eval 3.3] } { Inaccuracy. e5 was best. } (36. e5 Nd5 37. hxg4 Qc2 38. gxh5 Qf5 39. Kg2 Qxh5 40. Qe4 Kf8 41. Nd4 Qh6 42. Qg4 Kf7) 36... hxg4 { [%eval 3.68] } 37. e5! { [%eval 3.53] } 37... gxf3 { [%eval 3.41] } 38. exf6+ { [%eval 3.46] [%mdl 4096] Endgame KQ-KQ } 38... Kf7 { [%eval 3.44] } 39. Qg4 { [%eval 3.61] } { White wants to mate with Qg7+. } 39... Kxf6 { [%eval 3.59] } 40. Qxf3+ { [%eval 3.7] } 40... Ke7 { [%eval 3.53] } 41. Qe4 { [%eval 3.54] } 41... Qb8 { [%eval 4.1] } 42. Qh4+ { [%eval 3.57] } 42... Kd7 { [%eval 4.11] } 43. Qd4+ { [%eval 4.07] } { White is clearly winning. } 43... Kc6 { [%eval 4.06] } 44. Qc4+ { [%eval 4.07] } 44... Kd6 { [%eval 4.03] } 45. Qf4+ { [%eval 4.05] } 45... e5 { [%eval 3.99] } 46. Qf6+ { [%eval 4.17] } 46... Kd5 { [%eval 4.09] } 47. Qxb6 { [%eval 4.0] } { , y Tabatabaei se ahorró una larga agonía. Accuracy: White = 81%, Black = 47%. } { PRECISÃO LICHESS: BRANCAS 96% PRETAS 94% } 1-0