[Event "New York Rice prel"] [Site "New York"] [Date "1916.??.??"] [Round "10"] [White "Capablanca, Jose Raul"] [Black "Schroeder, A."] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "0"] [BlackElo "0"] [Variant "Standard"] [ECO "D63"] [Opening "Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Henneberger Variation"] [Annotator "https://lichess.org/@/MarcoCasanova"] [StudyName "for Website: Principle of Two Weaknesses"] [ChapterName "Capablanca - Schroeder New York 1916"] [Source "https://lichess.org/study/0DbfK1hG/ZuUaJLGM"] [Orientation "white"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Nbd7 5. Bg5 Be7 6. e3 O-O 7. Rc1 a6 8. Qc2 Re8 9. Bd3 dxc4 10. Bxc4 b5 11. Bd3 Bb7 12. a4 b4 13. Bxf6 Nxf6 14. Ne4 Nxe4 15. Bxe4 Bxe4 16. Qxe4 c5 17. dxc5 Qa5 18. b3 Bxc5 19. Ng5 h6 20. Qh7+ Kf8 { Choose between the two candidate moves 21 Qh8+ and 21 Ne4. -- -- Black expected 21 Ne4(!), which he intended to meet with 21 .. Rac8, banking on the trap 22 Qh8+? Ke7 23 Qxg7 ..Bd4 ! ! . However, 22 0-0! (or 22 Ke2 !) is strong, and indeed a rather clearer win than the move chosen, but both lines are good if followed up accurately. To Schroeder's chagrin, Capablanca sidestepped the trap, although in a different way: } 21. Qh8+!? Ke7 22. Qxg7 hxg5 23. Qxg5+ Kd6 24. Ke2!? Rac8 25. Rc4 Kc6 26. Rhc1 Kb6 { Let us consider this position from the standpoint of the principle of two weaknesses. We are struck by the ridiculous bunch of black pieces on the queenside, tied to the defence of the bishop on c5. This entanglement may be viewed as the first weakness. The game is decided by executing a second threat - on the kingside. } 27. h4! f5 28. Qg7! Re7 29. Qe5 Rc6 30. Rxc5 { 1-0 Black resigns. } 1-0