Search "user:mrbasso"

At your rating an opening repertoire is a waste of time. Better learn the strategical ideas of the openings you play!

@Brian-E said in #57: > It would be of doubtful value because for non-specialists it's impossible to be certain whether someone is cheating or not. > > The first category you mention, which you must i…

I could show you dozens of counterexamples where obvious cheaters were not banned and others were banned although they didn't cheat IF I'm allowed to post games but I'm not...

Of course all this automatic cheating detections fail if the suspected player only cheats occasionally and/or possibly makes some belivable mistakes on purpose.

?? If you are giving up the advantage it's always a mistake. Of course every strong player plays 2.cxd5 here winning a tempo or a pawn.

Fischer used a long time to become the best and stopped playing after dominating for only 3 years. That's all you can say.

@AsDaGo said in #5: > I play 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. Bf4 c5 4. e3 Nc6 5. c3 Qb6 against the London (of course reachable through many other move orders as well). You could also play ...Qb6 earlier even …

@Cedur216 said in #2: > Accuracy is never worth bragging Non...se! In a long game with decent play of the opponent it is. But here black opened the game horribly and played the game badly from start t…

No, if you play 1.d4 d5 there are various ways for white to play for a draw. Not much to do against it. That's why I play 1...d6 but of course this allows 2.e4. Anyway. I win most games against the Lo…

@szachisia said in #6: > @mrbasso > > You are right here, there are a lot of random openings, d4? was not played by @szachisia and by the opponent and was easily punished. (98% accuracy without error …