lichess.org
Donate

Search "user:chgreg"

12 forum posts
General Chess Discussion - swiss and round tournament #25

I wouldn't be so sure that lack of Swiss tournament increases amount of arena players. People who don't like arena can play on other sites or don't play tournaments at all. Or maybe Lichess developers…


chgreg
General Chess Discussion - GM Magnus Carlsen account is for real?#34

Provisional ratings: 2800 - it seems likely. There are some very strange informations when you click on stats, for example classical: https://lichess.org/@/MagnusCarlsen/perf/classical 17 games, highe…


chgreg
General Chess Discussion - Adding Rapid and Slow rating categories. - Please vote !#45

@Spartako - as for "very few people relatively" - for example some variants weekly stats: King of the Hill - 756 players Three-check - 835 players Racing Kings - 452 players In comparison to above - w…


chgreg
General Chess Discussion - Adding Rapid and Slow rating categories. - Please vote !#37

@EvilChess , are you in touch with lichess developers ? If so, are they convinced to do this change ?


chgreg
General Chess Discussion - Adding Rapid and Slow rating categories. - Please vote !#23

@EvilChess , I don't play bullet and I'm not interested in ultra/hyper/whatever bullet rating, but... I guess it's no problem to play 20 bullet games during 1 hour and 100-200 games per a day (or week…


chgreg
General Chess Discussion - Adding Rapid and Slow rating categories. - Please vote !#21

I think splitting classic into rapid and standard is enough and also necessary. Leaving it in present shape mixes rapid and classic games in one rating zone. Creating too many ranges would cause probl…


chgreg
General Chess Discussion - Adding a new 30+ min rating category !!#5

I agree. This site is great, but it's strange to treat 8 min game as classic. It's not even a rapid chess, IMO, just longer blitz.


chgreg
[You can't access this team forum post]
[You can't access this team forum post]
General Chess Discussion - HOW TO IMPROVE FASTER ?#42

@BobC , thanks for link - I'll read it soon. @CafeMorphy , I didn't write that bigger is always better. However thanks for your remarks. I guess Silman's Complete Endgame Course is also worth reading ?


chgreg