| Game analysis - Can someone explain why this move is a blunder please? +2 is still very far from game over. There is no easy win for white. | ![]() |
| Game analysis - Can someone explain why this move is a blunder please? You walked into a discovered check, allowing white king to get safer. Meanwhile, white queen was almost trapped. For example, after bishop trade on e4, Qxa5 would allow Bb4+ winning a queen. | ![]() |
| Game analysis - This is rare It would be just a normal game, but at some point I found an interesting way to attack my opponent's castle. https://lichess.org/HL856bT7/white#0 | ![]() |
| Game analysis - Unexpected checkmate Sacrificed a piece for a draw, but the opponent still played for a win (for me)... https://lichess.org/xzHAUkAY/white#89 | ![]() |
| Game analysis - Claimed draw on insufficient material? Fair draw. Both players were unable to deliver a checkmate. For different reasons. | ![]() |
| Off-Topic Discussion - unpopular opinion; berserking is rude and disrespectufl, lichess should remove it @Cedur216 said [^] > > Many newbies or lower rated told me they quit playing there because of the weirdos players going berserk. > > Wait what? I think quite the opposite, for me it's coward if a 1000… | ![]() |
| Off-Topic Discussion - Any Ice Breakers? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_NjEDK1r48 | ![]() |
| Off-Topic Discussion - anyone ever changed your opinion on something mid-argument? You clearly noted a word "feeling" I used. Briefly, it's not about feeling. | ![]() |
| Off-Topic Discussion - anyone ever changed your opinion on something mid-argument? Standalone "facts" are often easy to misinterpret. Climate deniers, for example, are quite notorious with bringing facts into discussion. Flat Earth adepts are less successful, but they can be quite c… | ![]() |
| Game analysis - you get 100% accuracy for sure. According to the analysis, that's just 98%... | ![]() |
| Next |
|---|
