Stalemating is Theoretically impossible?

Did you know youcan say that stalemating is impossible theoretically?

As to reach stalemate you cannot have any legal move but resigning it technically a move so in a stalemate position you would have to resign as you have no other option :)

Give me your opinions about this as i find it a very interesting subject :)

Resigning is not considered a move, it is considered the end of a game. If you resigned when you could have played move 45, the game would have ended on move 44

That's not really true.

Resigning is not considered a move, a move is written down on a piece of paper like this 1. <move> <move> 2. <move> <move> ...
You never see something like this ... 56. Ne4+ Kf5 57. resignation.

Stalemate is a special rule in chess which says that when the position is reached it's automatically a draw, so as soon as you click the clock it's considered a draw and you can't even resign then even if you wanted to.

That's my opinion on the subject.

From Fide's laws of chess:

"The game is drawn when the player to move has no legal move and his king is not in check. The game is said to end in ‘stalemate’. This immediately ends the game, provided that the move producing the stalemate position was in accordance with Article 3 and Articles 4.2 – 4.7."

When a stalemate position appears on the board, the game is immediately over, provided the move causing the stalemate was made legally.

Since the game is simply immediately over, (as @NemPlayer also indicated) there is no game to resign at that point.

And the rules don’t need to change forever.

1. f3 e5 2. g4 Qh4# draw agreed

+1 @grapejam

Resigning is not a move.

If white resigned after 1. e4 e5 the scoresheet would say 1. e4 e5 0-1, not 1. e4 e5 2 0-1