lichess.org
Donate

Conscience.

Hey, @Onyx_Chess, what are you talking about? "pestering the good people of this community" is what you wrote on #11. How do you even define "good people"? What do you mean by bad people? Do you just want to discriminate the people who YOU define as "bad", take note, the people who YOU define as bad. Without any guidelines, you dictate. There's more! You don't even want to improve these people in any particular way. You just put assumptions! Like what you did here:

You wrote on #9: "Also, it's not a surprise that Menkhenamen would rather damage and scar this environment and atmosphere than play a good game of chess."

You also wrote on #11: "In other words, people like you, Menk, will be completely ignored because you'll be 1:100 and your posts will be nearly impossible to find, much less influence anything. Since you want attention, and since you'll get less and less and less, you'll find a new target where you can manipulate your designs much more easily."

You seem to be spreading false info. Assumptions. Unmatched insults.
What did @Menkhenamen even do and got you to assume these?

When @fiercefighter asked if what even is this, you replied: "Exercise and discovery for me. Just examining and studying the opposition."
You excercise and discover by excessively assuming and insulting other people based on the fantasy world you have created by your assumptions..

You wrote on #9 a boastful assumption. "I'm just the biggest chess enthusiast on the planet, author, concerned citizen, friend, et cetera."
You have no proof at all. You just come to ignore all those other people who are enthusiasts, author, concerned citizen, friend, etcetera! How dare you declare that you are the biggest? Where did your conscience go? I thought this thread was about conscience?

Here you come: #9 "I'm just a guy that wants to produce more goodness and justice and everything else that is Godly and constructive and productive."
Goodness? Yeah. By making assumtions of @Menkhenamen and insulting @Menkhenamen based on your assumptions? No definition of goodness at all.

What religion are you promoting on #1? You do know that there is a lot of religions right? And people have different beliefs than yours? And that you should respect their belief? And not control their belief?
Coincidently yesterday I had a dream about someone named Ace and they were a n00b.
"Later, Popanz was spotted vainly attempting to edit the above post, to add that the above and hereby rementioned post was in fact NOT directed at clousems, but rather wunnadem curving bullet tricks we all know and love from the movies. Didn't work.)
<Comment deleted by user>
<Comment deleted by user>
<Comment deleted by user>
@Onyx_Chess Seriously? You're the one who is a hypocrite, not me. You're siding on goodness with an ignorant attitude.

I have stated at least 5 question for your argument yet you only reply me with one line. No answer at all.

I chose to be on the other side because I believe that your side of the argument is ignorant, disrespectful and full of assumptions.

You say you are on the side of "goodness" and everyone who questions your argument is an enemy? is subject to insult? is a hypocrite?

You see, your responses are effortless. Didn't even dare to understand our voices.
Oh so you had more replies. Sorry, I didn't see them before posting mine.

Well you tell us to practice courtesy after you have unnecessarily disrespected someone earlier. Well, you gotta answer my questions on #31 and state whatever question you answered.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.