This game shows that human can compete with Stockfish!!

By compete you mean a draw every 100 games?

Little Giants quote:

Danny O'Shea: Well, wait a second, guys. Who said you had to be good to play football? You play football because you want to. You play football because it's fun. You play football so you could pretend you're Joe Montana throwing a touchdown pass, or Emmitt Smith going for a long run. And even if those Cowboys are better than you guys, even if they beat you 99 times out of 100, that still leaves...

Tad: One time.

Rudy Zolteck: One time.

Junior Floyd: [Smiles] Yeah one time!

Even if you could draw 1 in 1000 it means that you broke the algorithm the best engine thinks which is good result in meaning that you can find variations the engine didnt consider till the end!!

Oh good, so we at least have a chance at a draw until some lazy chess engine programmer notices the flaw in their coding and fixes it. That's promising. :)

#3 I don't see your point. Even someone playing random moves could draw against Stockfish.

The „drawing margin“ is relatively broad in chess so once in a blue moon a draw is possible I think.

"Even playing random moves could someone draw vs stockfish"?!Well its funny because an engine having rating 3400+ obviously didnt get this rating by playing "random moves" right?!

Also Kasparov said that the best player in world in their best day could get only draw with Stockfish,so these things are interconnected!

Try BAD MODO and I promise you an infinite number of victories!

@Dim89 yes, of course carlsen would get some draws against stockfish, but that is not the point. Stockfish has an expectancy of 95% when playing carlsen, which means that carlsen is expected to draw stockfish every ten games. But Stockfish would still have beaten him 9,5-0,5.