I definitely support it. I have actually timed out several times in completely won where I can premove almost everything, and there, having multiple premoves would be excellent. I would switch to playing in chess.com (which does have that feature in ANY time control) entirely for that reason.
@Maltrek I'd like to point out that premoving on lichess takes off no time. Meanwhile, premoving on chess dot com takes at least 0.10 second of the clock. That means even if you have 1.0 seconds on chess dot com, the most moves you have left is 10 moves to make. You will time out there too.
@breaker90 two things:
1. That's true, but you can't premove the next move in 0.1 seconds in lichess. If you premove 5 moves in chess.com, it takes 0.5 seconds plus whatever you took on the first move. On lichess, it will take 1 second per premove, because it takes time to premove each individual move.
2. nobody writes chess dot com.
1. That's true, but you can't premove the next move in 0.1 seconds in lichess. If you premove 5 moves in chess.com, it takes 0.5 seconds plus whatever you took on the first move. On lichess, it will take 1 second per premove, because it takes time to premove each individual move.
2. nobody writes chess dot com.
@Maltrek for sure, you are right. I was just pointing out people will definitely time out in chess dot com as well. Sometimes when I do like 5 premoves (such as marching a passed pawn) and my opponent makes a move that ends all the premoves, I get lost for a second to realize what happened and why all my premoves stopped. I suppose it's a matter of preference but I don't see much difference between lichess and chess dot com.
And the reason why I call it chess dot com is because I don't like being an ad for them and have it automatically create a hyperlink. Lol
And the reason why I call it chess dot com is because I don't like being an ad for them and have it automatically create a hyperlink. Lol
K and Q vs K is doable in 6 seconds in chess.com thanks to multiple premoves. In lichess that's just impossible.
If this idea would be realised then it would change the current - already perfect - gameplay.
i don't support this feature.
It takes less skill to use the multipremove. T
he current system requires more concentration on the part of the player. i don't want to lose that.
It takes less skill to use the multipremove. T
he current system requires more concentration on the part of the player. i don't want to lose that.
(Idea of Captain Kristo) What's this title? Idea of Captain Kristo??? This feature has been requested many, many times over the years. This feature was being requested back in 2014 lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/multiple-premoves#1 and it most certainly is NOT the idea of Captain Kristo aka @rzenaikrzys
While we are on the topic of Captain Kristo, if you look carefully, you can tell that he is a fraud, and I can't believe everyone doesn't know this. Look at his top rated victories in Atomic, King of the Hill, and Antichess; they have 1500s in them, yet he manipulated the rating system to get a high rating, and now he plays one game a week against a very high rated BOT account or an unrated 1500? player.
Now, I do think multiple premoves could be nice to have, but Thibault himself has spoken github.com/ornicar/lila/issues/3890
While we are on the topic of Captain Kristo, if you look carefully, you can tell that he is a fraud, and I can't believe everyone doesn't know this. Look at his top rated victories in Atomic, King of the Hill, and Antichess; they have 1500s in them, yet he manipulated the rating system to get a high rating, and now he plays one game a week against a very high rated BOT account or an unrated 1500? player.
Now, I do think multiple premoves could be nice to have, but Thibault himself has spoken github.com/ornicar/lila/issues/3890
I support this feature quite well because I have lost many Blitz, Bullet and Ultrabullet games by time out. This can help me quite a lot.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.