Ok, thanks ๐
#1 Yes, I have that too even this high up, and I hate it
Do these people actually know they can analyse there puzzles afterwards with Stockfish to check, why there solutions are wrong?
@nooboss well we werenโt born with this innate knowledge so no, these people didnโt know that. But we do now, so thanks for helping us not be so damn stupid!
There's alsways one best move - form the point of view of Stockfisch or any other engine. There are often more than one best moves - from the point of view of a human being.
So, a chess teacher would explain the problem. Lichess puzzle feature doesn't explain anything. That's the problem here. And it's okay. You have to accept it.
So, a chess teacher would explain the problem. Lichess puzzle feature doesn't explain anything. That's the problem here. And it's okay. You have to accept it.
I agree, except the engine is right, and its point of view becomes the human being point of view, after the human being sees it and understands it.
Puzzles, like truth, are not about point of views. They're about objectively good and bad moves. Just because someone fails to see why a move is bad, doesn't make the move good.
Still waiting for examples of puzzles with multiple solutions. BTW I have a unicorn in my garden right now.
Puzzles, like truth, are not about point of views. They're about objectively good and bad moves. Just because someone fails to see why a move is bad, doesn't make the move good.
Still waiting for examples of puzzles with multiple solutions. BTW I have a unicorn in my garden right now.
i first time saw thibault post in a forum so many times
A unicorn? Lichess going commercial?
The real unicorn here is seeing Thibault comment three times on a post. I love it!
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.