Correlation. ELO-Number of possible future moves.

Has anyone read or watched a video about whether a correlation can be established between ELO and the number of future moves that can be viewed in the mind? (On chessboard, competitions. No training).

For examples:

+Novice 1000-1600 = Number of future moves?.
+Intermediate 1600-2000 = Number of future moves?.
+Strong 2000-2500 = Number of future moves?
+>2500 = Number of future moves?.

I mean. An approximation. We all know if 2 players have 2200 the moves,variants...number and more things analyzed will not be the same.
I never read anything about it.

It would be a great help and reference for novices like me, to know that x player with x ELO can see x movements. And it will be very different if we are in opening, middle or final game.

Thanks.

It's more about accuracy than depth. There are plenty of tactical problems that are very short, say 2 or 3 moves, that will challenge even quite strong players. So saying you can see e.g. 20 moves doesn't mean much if you happen to have missed a tactical idea on the first move!

@OhNoMyPants

Many thanks for your answer. Excellent explanation and congratulations for your towering scores.

From my humble and scarce knowledge I keep thinking (someday I can change my opinion) that the most important thing in this art of chess is "to watch or intuit future": very high reach in the number of movements, variants, ramifications ....
Fischer said of Petrosian that he could see 20 moves in advance. I don´t know if the equivalence is 40 movements.

I remember a funny anecdote:
"How many moves do you see ahead?".
"10".
"And you". (in reference to the rival).
"One, but always I choose the best". (maybe when they are playing)
Asked to Capablanca and his opponent but now I'm not sure who said what.

The main difference between strong players and medium and weak players lies not as much in the calculating power. Most moves are played without any calculation at all. Briljant games with sacrificial attacks get published more often, which conveys a false impression that chess is about that.

Weak players blunder and a medium or strong player rarely misses an opportunity to exploit that.

Medium players make strategic mistakes that land them in lost endgames. Strong players confidently convert seemingly small endgame advantages to a win.

1285 ELO. I recall analyzing ~15 plies (7.5) deep in a double bishop sac position. There is no correlation.

Any player will analyze very deep when provided enough time to do so.

Sometimes I play just by ear. Experts have gathered tens of thousands of chunks which enables them to calculate very little. They see the right move instantly. You cannot play blitz or bullet and calculate deeply.

To the contrary sometimes you see an „invisible“ move „buried“ 4 moves deep or calculate a long line with perfection.

So both extremes are possible.

PS: I would say the good players do not calculate very much more - they calculate the relevant stuff though.