Why human reviews are so rare?

I was thinking about this since I joined reddit and lichess. Requests for game analysis are very rare. Mostly people post tactics or won games to brag about. Are people just content with stockfish reviews?
I enjoyed writing and reading reviews for baduk games and it didn't matter how strong reviewer was. Why it's so different for chess players?

(I haven't seen many people ask for reviews when i played baduk, maybe because my level was not high enough.)

I think more people are content with the strength of the computer, even though it doesn't explain much. And it's much faster to get a review from the computer in chess as opposed to waiting several days for some kind fellow to take his/her time and review your game. In go there is no effective computer analysis and you basically have to wait weeks until some dan player comes and helps you; I think that's why you see more requests, because there's no effective computer analysis.