lichess.org

Why is this a blunder?

yo oy oouojmlFMKDOLFQ C/NK§ JJJJJIIIJRTTTDEUEUVHYYETCTCTDFDFDFRRRCRCRCCRUZgfdfgffdfg
aliuyreziyut
zlkeroiuref
aehgolakhaijhiguajlg
akghkjzkjqflkgGIKfgdfFZKUadfgdgfghjkjoigzdyq(hebkcxgr
RRRCRCRCCRCRCAKHLFHlhFQKGHQLQHGhqlhgqhgJHFjhfHFhfjHF
Kf6 is not a blunder. Engine didn't think enough, it already was a draw. The blunder was to not come closer with your king at move 46.
I'm not really that much good at endgames, but according to Stockfish, when you increase the depth to 40+, you are right, there is no difference between Kf6 and Kg6, because both moves are evaluated with 0.0 and I guess they lead to draw with perfect play.
Server-side analysis has limited depth so at that limited depth it will mark that move as a blunder.

In fact, at depth 50 Stockfish suggests 48. ...a5 as best move with evaluation -0.5 (but I really don't know if that means any concrete winning possibilities).
Its funny that if you moved your king at F6 during your move at 46 it wouldn't consider it a blunder, but at move 48 it did lmao.
Anyway the blunder is an engine fault possibly although it seems to be inaccuracy at best than a blunder in my opinion.

You honestly missed your win during your move at 46 which should lead to a forced checkmate, I guess the engine wanted to taunt you about that move for no reason xD.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.