Engine calculates #-14 but recommends move leading immediately to #8. Last forum post on similar topic appears to be two years old.
Why does it matter? Did you win? Can you calculate mate in 8 in a complex position? I feel like this isn't the most productive worry in engine analysis.
I guess the local analysis is not strong enough to be always accurate in complex positions.
@MeWantCookieMobile Yes, I did because no, my opponent couldn't. I'm not sure it 'matters' (though presumably it does to you, since you took the time to respond) but I found it interesting.
@shakki-mestari123 clearly this is so, even at depth>20. The correct continuation here is B@a3+, which does lead to forced mate eventually, however white responds. It would be hard to prosecute of course, especially since if white plays accurately black has to give up the Q for the N on f5.
@shakki-mestari123 clearly this is so, even at depth>20. The correct continuation here is B@a3+, which does lead to forced mate eventually, however white responds. It would be hard to prosecute of course, especially since if white plays accurately black has to give up the Q for the N on f5.
Since it's not immediately obvious. I was responding because it's important to me to get people to stop relying on computers for their ego and use them for real analysis. Beyond that I don't care. The rest was rhetorical.
@MeWantCookieMobile You mean you misread it. That's OK, the best of us make mistakes after all.
@MeWantCookieMobile ironic to complain on an internet forum about lack of productivity.
@MeWantCookieMobile trying to understand what you're on about? Yes, I tried but it's clearly a wild goose chase.
Why worry about how stockfish calculates mate? And I just realized. Since when does stockfish even play crazyhouse?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.