an opening variation that computers can't understand

@self_service Agreed.

Short and to the point :)

to one who don't have fact remains only offenses.All you say that offenses are to be banned from forum

@lello33leone Have you considered the offences you've made to those who genuinely play chess? I think not.

The boy can not be judged by what he did or will do. Please, the 'fact' of him using engine in his games has nothing to do with with his statements in this post. This is ad hominem and should not be tolerated in a forum.

Someone, please, have the decency to check the sources he quoted? He quoted sources, the other guy up there just said in words that traxler loses by force, but did not quote in one source.

I do not have an opinion formed, but I bother to see people using ad hominem and making postulates as if they were facts without citing any source. What I saw is the guy citing two games and one MCO page. Have any of your opossums checked it out? Or have you just verified that he uses engine in his games, which has nothing to do with his postulates?

i like how the OP is an engine user.

#5 The surest sign of an opening being dead is when an opening patzer like me can reliably defeat it; and yes, the Traxler variation is dead.

My source is Harry Potter and the deathly hallows. Go read it.

^^^

@osdeving8 this is a little ironic...

I just checked @lello33leone 's profile and it looks like he's never played the Traxler across his 40 games. I'll go check again, but I don't think it's there.

Here's all of his games with the black pieces: lichess.org/@/lello33leone/search?players.a=lello33leone&players.black=lello33leone&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc

Also, I happened across the best-named opening ever: lichess.org/ElJAS7ea/black