Could you try to avoid spoilers in the titles of the blog posts?
@Ilyps I wholeheartedly agree with this!
Some of us like to "TIVO" the games so to speak.
Some of us like to "TIVO" the games so to speak.
Why the computer analysis is never requested in those studies by their authors? Is it not interesting?
I could not find other way to look on the analysis, since study does not give a link to a game itself, pretending that everything important is already included in the study.
I could not find other way to look on the analysis, since study does not give a link to a game itself, pretending that everything important is already included in the study.
@Alex_slow This I also agree with, both points.
1. Why would someone find a game so interesting or important it makes them want to make and share it in a study but NOT see its analysis?
2. If for whatever reason they don't want to see the computer analysis why disable it for other people?
And that's the only reason you can't request a computer analysis, if they disabled that ability. But you can still do it if you click on the 'share an export' icon. Then you can clone the study and you will have permission to request a computer analysis or you could download the pgn and do it that way. But why add extra steps?
1. Why would someone find a game so interesting or important it makes them want to make and share it in a study but NOT see its analysis?
2. If for whatever reason they don't want to see the computer analysis why disable it for other people?
And that's the only reason you can't request a computer analysis, if they disabled that ability. But you can still do it if you click on the 'share an export' icon. Then you can clone the study and you will have permission to request a computer analysis or you could download the pgn and do it that way. But why add extra steps?
Well, that is complicated stuff :) In fact, I do not want to clone the studies infinitely, I just want to have access to initial games used there. Overall, I feel "study" feature is too sofisticated for me, and it is very hard to see anything behind the things that study-owner "allows" you to see.
i like that blog posts are now discussed in the forum.
Isn't this the wrong one?
wrong?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.