La France Aux Francais!??? by GianMarco

@CountGianMarcoDorio

'Violence is "never" appropriate!??'...... No.... Read carefully:
- Violence shouldn't be "good" under any justification.

SHOULDN'T BE! Doesn't mean it can't be if you have a valid justification.

Anyway, by reading you I can sense that you're a PATRIOT, love your country and worship your bloodline.

Violence and Salacious peasants?
What you say in this paragraph is extremely true an false at the same time! That's why Hitler's arguments where always so effective and convincing. In my humble opinion there's a little of a contradiction about using the word 'belligerent' next to 'Tibetan Buddhists' which are known to be peacefull none hostile people.

Third Reich? Really?
(Don't get me wrong, I'm not attacking you, just sharing and exchanging ideas.)
Well I don't care about 3rd Regimes of 'nonsense', but I certainly do not sponsor these arguments - those about America been the best country of the world, having the richest GDP and all that LOGO logical thinking that probably your OTHER PATRIOTS told you.

Preserving the bloodline?
We all belong to the same family: MAMALS
Doesn't really matter if America or Russia have the better MAMALS, at the end we're all HUMANS. That's why it doesn't make sense to 'preserve the bloodline'. This is propaganda arguments work out by 3rd RRR to blame others for all the misery that's going on in the world.

France, France, France?
So... Basically you're asking French people to set up a 4th Reich '?!' Dubious...

Please feel free to reply
c:\

@Marlonc

I've a friend who works in navy intelligence. His claim is that we, the United States, have a weapon that was developed in the 1980's that can destabilize all electronic devices over an area and even redirect rockets who are guided by computer chips. Hence, if there was a war with Russia or China, this friend of mine claims that Russia or China would just simply go "dark" and merely wait for the inevitable extermination to ensue.
Bon Apetit!

@CountGianMarcoDorio this friend of yours is pulling your pisser. Once ICBMs are in the air they continue until they reach their target. It's a matter of physics. Besides, given that your whole premise can be summarised as 'might is right', if the US has the technology to enable world domination through military means then what on earth are they waiting for? Oh right...if they kill everyone else then they won't make money from them any longer. But then again, it would solve that little debt problem that they have, plus no more migrants.

My French isn't great, but I think you'll find it's bon *appétit*

@polylogarithmique @w00chess correct me if I am wrong.

@CountGianMarcoDorio We're all belligerent in here because we are chess players! Straight to the throat! Not literally.

@CountGianMarcoDorio I visited France last year and there was nothing big happening.

@Marlonc
Good point! It is Bon Appétit...I was typing fast.

@w00chess @Orderly @Marlonc
Let me make my position rather more clear....
1) When I say "salacious peasant" I'm not referring to the 'common frenchman' who merely desires to go to work, eat some cheese, berate a few unemployed psychology majors, and fornicate his neigbor's wife every once in a while before watching a soccer game! When I say "salacious peasant" I am referring to that special class of human being that is MORE animal THAN man!!....That "special" class of our society that was most feared by men like Tolstoy, Rachmaninoff, and other great noble thinkers who understood that they were surrounded by a peasant class that was just waiting for the opportunity to commit acts of murder, rape, theft, and any other acts of violence or delinquency that separates those of us that are civilized from those of us who are strictly savage!
2) My relation to the Third Reich: This is actually very innocent and understandable. My family was a noble family in Northern Italy. We considered that nazis better than the communists because the communists in Russia were burning Churches and killing and torturing religious leaders. The nazis (at least in the beginning) defended the Church such as is for example one of many instances depicted by the motto, "Gott mit uns!" Hitler promised no war but rather bullying and clever politics....that sounded good. Between 1942 and 1944 we tried to assassinate Himmler three times....all were unsuccessful.
3) Violence!??? It's a beautiful thing when it's used to keep the "salacious peasant" in line!!! When violence is used for greed or to empower evil people, then I certainly agree that it's bad!

You clearly do not understand Tolstoy in the slightest. His work formed the basis for most of M.K. 'Mahatma' Gandhi's ideas. As for your attempted defence of the indefensible, all you have demonstrated is that you would cheerfully drag a knife across the throat of your best mate were it ever in your interests to do so, and therefore you are in no position to criticise the morals of one who sleeps with another's wife. BTW fornicate is an intransitive verb.

@Marlonc
You have an obsession with grammar similar to Ghandi's obsession with hunger!! When someone writes something you disagree with, you seem to be more interested in the grammar they chose rather than the more important ideas. When you're beloved ENGLAND instituted politics opposed to Ghandi's idealism, he starved himself and prayed to one of his imaginary friends!!

My suggestion to you is that you reread Tolstoy's "War and Peace" and while you're at it you might as well read Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment." Laced within both of these most interesting existentialist perspectives who write about everyday circumstances we see new perspectives that challenge even the social norms of our modern day. Certainly even in "War and Peace" we can clearly see what I call the "salacious peasant" lurking within the unrefined savage of even modern man. That "salacious peasant" is something beyond race, or ideology, or religion, or wealth/poverty....it is something that exists in our humanity that we must be always vigilantly fighting against!! Even uneducated malcontents like you @Marlonc can understand that!!!

"Defense of the indefensible!???" ....I assume your referring to the pathetic and traitorous members of the "Resistance??" who were too blind and cowardly to join those of us who had the ability to change the Third Empire from the inside, or are you referring to the voting populace in France who refuse to see the sheer truth to LePen's political ideology??, or is perhaps that you are referring to the communists who favored worshiping the 'Red Dragon' as opposed to maintaining a sacred loyalty to the Holy Church which the NSDAP gloriously maintained!!??? What exactly are you referring to @Marlonc ???

@CountGianMarcoDorio his "imaginary friends" might not be imaginary. You realize religions haven't been proven wrong or right completely.

And this has nothing to do with France