lichess.org
Donate

Considering a move

@phlegm

Here is how I calculate chess moves
(When I do it right anyways...) I'm in the 2000 range.

Bullet: Very little calculation for the most part it is just play the 1st move that enters your head. For this reason I dislike bullet, and almost never play it. I only ever play it if I'm trying to practice for time pressure. That's all I think it's really any good for. Fast fast fast... fast fast fast...

Blitz: Similar to bullet, but every so often you can take a stop for a moment, and try to slip some quality moves in. fast fast fast think... fast fast think...

Classical: This is where real chess is. With less time pressure you can really let your calculating shine. Think think think fast... think think fast... think think think fast... lots more thinking here, and a lot less fast.

As for my calculations I'm going to focus on my thought process in classical as opposed to other time controls where less focus is put on calculations, and more so on raw speed.

Gonna break it down into thought processes at the 3 points of the game:

Opening: This is where the least calculations are needed. You "just know" what kind of openings you are most comfortable with. Sometimes you will pause for a moment to make sure you are getting enough development, piece activity, king safety, space, and so on. A lot of it is book knowledge, but sometimes you are not familiar with the lines, and you need to figure out good moves. Take a little time to make sure you are playing accurately, and not blundering. If you come across an unfamiliar line feel free to think it out. However the decision to play either the Italian, Spanish, or Scotch game on move 3 should not be that thought out. You already know your favorite move there, play it most the time, but hay maybe you want to mix it up and expand your repertoire.

Middle game: This is where you find your plan. Avoid hanging pieces. Try to get some edge. Look for a way to attack or counterattack. Keep your pieces active. Generally you need to be able to exploit two weaknesses to win. Look for double attacks. Use tactics. If you are dumbfounded as to what to move figure out which of your pieces is placed worst, and try to find a better square for it.

Moving into the endgame: You should have a general idea if you are winning, drawing, or losing by the time you get to this point. If you gotta sacrifice all of your pieces to get into an endgame you know for sure how to win do it. Look at variations, figure out the best way to proceed.

Most importantly in all phases of the game, is not only to look at your own plan. When I was a lower rated player I often only looked at my own moves. "I do this, then this, then this..." That was how I thought... Then I evolved into "I do this, you do that, I do this, you do that" There is nothing more delightful in a chess game as to when you find a good move for your opponent. but they play the lesser move that gives you that sought after advantage. This thought style helps avoid missing tactics.
Kramnik replying to candidate moves: "It's a mess in my head, there is no structure!"
Seirawan referred to Kotov"s "Think Like a GM" as "garbage, total garbage."
"Do you think like a tree? I don't think like a tree!" GM Anatoly Lein

Hey, I tried to convince the people that a strict usage of "Kotov" is crap and I gave a simple example. People wanted "higher" opinions. It was close to getting personal - two fellows reminded me of my title...

After posting the video there's silence. Ask Vlad if you want to know something - or is he suddenly too strong to be relevant for Woody Woodpusher? And, believe it or not, he's not alone.

PS: of course I deal with candidate moves and calculate them but rather free-style.
A nice video indeed.

I think the topic died a bit because everything has been said. Since I stick to my previous posts, there is no need to reply to repeat that. Except for your post just now, provoking a reply from the "camp" that had a different opinion than you :-)
Yeah, you're right. There's nothing to say I ain't said before.

I will hand it over to Vlad Kramnik, he will answer everything. :)
@lurarose

Thanks for that step by step approach to the different phases of the game.

I shall memorise your comment where you say .....

"There is nothing more delightful in a chess game as to when you find a good move for your opponent, but they play the lesser move which gives you that sought after advantage."

You said that very well. :-D

Seirawan was referring to Kotov's "pick a candidate move, analyse it through to it's conclusion and move on to the next candidate move, not wasting time double checking the accuracy of the evaluation." Yassar said he knows of no GM that isn't constantly "double checking, reevaluating variations." Said Kotov did a great disservice to all chess players.
The video was good stuff. Giri's answer on candidates moves was typical Giri ! (He'll analysis a candidate move to the end only if he thinks he's winning or lost, which rarely happens" :-) Kramnik saying "I was considering playing some nonsense!"

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.