<Comment deleted by user>
<Comment deleted by user>
as @l8pawn said, you traded your way into a strategically lost endgame. The reason for this (in general) is because white has a 4 on 3 king side majority so he will be able to create a passed pawn on the kingside. On the other hand, black has a 4 on 3 majority on the queenside but due to the double pawns, black will be unable to create a passed pawn (at the very least it will be very difficult).
Edit: while the ending may not be completely lost, it is very difficult to hold in practice
@bugcat2 The thing is: with after 4. Bxc6, black can play Bd6 to defend the e-pawn in 1 move (the e-pawn can't be captured immediately with 5. Nxe5?, but after 5. O-O, white threatens to capture the e pawn.
With 6. Bxc6, the Bd6 move will be awkward because it will require a second tempo to move (as it was already moved to e7)...
So white's loss of tempo matches with black's loss of tempo.
With 6. Bxc6, the Bd6 move will be awkward because it will require a second tempo to move (as it was already moved to e7)...
So white's loss of tempo matches with black's loss of tempo.
Thanks for the response but I don't really understand, @SavageAntarctican .
If 4. bxc6 bd6 White just retreats the bishop to A4 or D5 and is up a piece?
If 4. bxc6 bd6 White just retreats the bishop to A4 or D5 and is up a piece?
@bugcat2 Let me show you the difference:
I see now, thanks c:
This thread always reminds me of Joni Mitchell.
I have a game which suits this thread just right :(
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.