Scotch Gambit or Bishops Opening?

Which opening is more aggressive and tricky? Scotch Gambit or Bishops Opening?

@Mister-NAFI

It definitely depends on your personal preference, as both of the openings have their merits.

I believe the Bishop's Opening mainly focuses on delaying the common Nf3 move, so the strategic f4 push can be played, putting more pressure on the center while expanding White's space.

On the other hand, the Scotch Gambit gambits a pawn (temporarily) to rapidly put pressure on the weak f7 square with the Bishop, Knight, and potentially some other pieces.

I mainly use the Bishop's Opening (Nc3 first, but it transposes), but that is just my preference, and many other players would disagree ;)

If the "Scotch Gambit" is the Goering, of course it is the more aggressive of the two. As to which is "trickier"...well, tricky is a tricky word. ;)

Scotch Gambit - I just enjoy it because of the trap potential and the aggressiveness.

Scotch gambit- a famous trap most people fall for and its aggressiveness

they can easily transpose

The Bishop's Opening is more aggressive, and therefore tricky. The main reason for this evaluation is the potential of the queen, not the advance of the f-pawn as most assume. An early Qg4 forces a weakness in black's camp. The Bishop's Opening also allows for the early pawn breaks on both d4 and f4.

I prefer the Scotch Gambit due to it taking a tempo to castle, then you can play aggressively without worrying about cheap traps against your king.

Scotch is my own favorite opening since some time now and I have learned it to be rich in ideas and very instructive. So it is a very active aggressive opening but still very solid and has almost no weaknesses.
But the move 4. ...d6 somewhat troubles me. I know White should reply by 5. Nxd5, winning back the knight but I don't understand the white's plan afterwards.