First, I want to clarify that this is an opinion, not a statement.
I think it's very sexist to have a different title just for not being male. You need less elo to become a WFM that a FM, I think that implies women are worse, and that's not true (in my opinion). In comparison with physical sports, it's very different; male have a biological advantage over women in sports. Male and female have the same cognitive ability so, why making this unnecessary distinctions?
Any opinions about this?
I think it's very sexist to have a different title just for not being male. You need less elo to become a WFM that a FM, I think that implies women are worse, and that's not true (in my opinion). In comparison with physical sports, it's very different; male have a biological advantage over women in sports. Male and female have the same cognitive ability so, why making this unnecessary distinctions?
Any opinions about this?