lichess.org
Donate

Is there a good. aggressive response to Queen's Pawn as black?

I don't know why, but I hate playing against 1.d4 as black and I never start with it as white. I there a good and aggressive response and/or line against the opening as black?
Me too, I always try to go off normal with albin counter, and try for lasker trap, or budapest opening. I try never to accept, I dont want to give them the satisfaction ;)
@BobLarysnkyGames
Try the Dutch, but any way , me too I hate d4 as black and white and make me feel boring and also it so hard for me this slow d4
#1 You might try the Robatsch Defense to 1.d4...It is a surrender the center, attack from the flank, aggressive, hypermodern type opening featuring a early fianchetto of blacks King Bishop. Its kind of like the hyper accelerated dragon in the Sicilian. This opening is a duel type opening which can also occur after 1.e4... I don't see it very often...but its an interesting option for black and I like playing against it as white. :] lichess.org/study/9oeVJbs0/ZPrUUQ2k#4,
Look at Slav Defense.. this in my option is the best response.
Dutch and Kings Indian. Very asymmetric so double edged. Can play both your whole life (dutch always a little suspect but never refuted).
I quite like the Grunfeld, and as a d4 player, it gives me shivers when playing against it as white.
I love Queen's gambit as white; hate it as black. I think the computer tells me why: white can preserve a decent advantage well into middle game if familiar with the moves. When I lose to a better player as white, it's typically because they shove a queenside pawn majority down my throat.
I am a huge fan of the Budapest Gambit. White rarely knows theory, and it gives Black a very playable game. In my opinion, it usually gives Black an advantage if you know the common plans better than your opponent, which is likely to be true.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.