What the most controversial opinion you have?

@Katzenschinken said in #66:
> No. You told me (and now you do it again) that you have some arguments to convince me that my view on evolution is wrong. I am still waiting for them.

Hmm.... I'm suspicious.
> Bring them on.

I guess you started doubting if I even have such.

The dust on the moon is not enough if the universe existed as much as evolution says. The rings of Saturn are also too close to the planet for that. And there isn't a single found fossil, that proves the evolution of human. Here you go, three proofs.

> He didn't.

How do you know? I don't know either. But I know that he might have done this. And you have no disproof, neither I have a proof for this. We don't know. We only have assumings. But here's one logical thing kinda on my side. The thing propaganda exists, so this isn't something widely told. Because of people like you.

@EnBeeTea said in #71:
> The dust on the moon is not enough if the universe existed as much as evolution says.

Evolution doesn't have anything to say about the age of the universe if you meant that with "exists as much"

> The rings of Saturn are also too close to the planet for that.

I don't even know what this is supposed to mean and how this is related to evolution.

> And there isn't a single found fossil, that proves the evolution of human.

Only in your dreams. Hell, Svante Pääbo even was able to extract DNA from bones of Neanderthals and prove that they are extremely close to the DNA of Homo sapiens.

> Here you go, three proofs.

Errm... no.

> How do you know? I don't know either. But I know that he might have done this.

So now we are on the level of "I don't have any shred of evidence but I can make up stuff just as I like and you have to prove it is not true." Yeah, maybe fairies visited Darwin at night and told him that all the ideas he had during his lifetime were fabricated by evil gnomes and that he had to reject them when walking alone through the forest and nobody could hear him. Could all be possible.

That's not how things work. If you claim that he rejected his own theory at some point in his life it is on you to prove your claim.

> The thing propaganda exists, so this isn't something widely told. Because of people like you.

Ok, so now I am a propangandist. I just wonder which part of "look at the evidence" is propaganda and for whom or what I am making the propaganda.

@Katzenschinken said in #72:
>
> Only in your dreams. Hell, Svante Pääbo even was able to extract DNA from bones of Neanderthals and prove that they are extremely close to the DNA of Homo sapiens.

How big is it?

@EnBeeTea

You can find everything you want to know here:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Paabo+S%5BAuthor%5D+Neanderthals&size=100

What about your other claims? Any explanations?

Also, with which political ideologies do you agree? I mean such as socialism and so on.

@Katzenschinken said in #74:
> @EnBeeTea

> What about your other claims? Any explanations?

Yup. Don't expect me to give up easily.

@EnBeeTea said in #75:
> Also, with which political ideologies do you agree? I mean such as socialism and so on.

*lol*

Really?

Yes, really.

@Katzenschinken said in #72:
> Evolution doesn't have anything to say about the age of the universe if you meant that with "exists as much"

Hm, really? I thought that for evolution to happen you need a lot of time... and years...

@EnBeeTea said in #79:
> Hm, really? I thought that for evolution to happen you need a lot of time... and years...

Yes. But as the universe is a lot older than the earth (13.8 billion years vs. 4.5 billion years) neither evolution nor the dust on the moon are in any way relevant to the age of the universe. And neither are the rings of Saturn.

But let me now ask you a question. Doesn't the fact that nothing of what you thought to be proof against evolution was really proof make you doubt your own beliefs about evolution? I mean, on your profile page you call yourself a religious person and I suspect a big part of you denying evolution comes from your religious beliefs (please correct me if I'm wrong). Or is nothing ever going to convince you that evolution could in fact be true?