I see no corr. chess tournaments at all on lichess...
chess.com has hundreds of them (to join, to create for premium members, with a really impressing list of options - e. g. avg. move speed of participants, vacation/no vacation/min. games played etc. etc.), Gameknot has dozens of mini-tournaments and even chessworld.net has them
It is clear that corr. chess makes less then 5 % of the games played, but if you want to be a major player, you should offer the full package. That lichess says, we cannot check for fair play in corr.chess, is no problem - corr. chess runs with this approach since years here and it runs well, it has less cheaters then other sites.
And apart from tourneys, if you want to take corr. chess more serious, there are 2 major functions missing:
1)opponent has played at least .... games (otherwise I must always abort dozens of games vs. opponents with no existing track record)
2)opponent average move speed
chess.com has hundreds of them (to join, to create for premium members, with a really impressing list of options - e. g. avg. move speed of participants, vacation/no vacation/min. games played etc. etc.), Gameknot has dozens of mini-tournaments and even chessworld.net has them
It is clear that corr. chess makes less then 5 % of the games played, but if you want to be a major player, you should offer the full package. That lichess says, we cannot check for fair play in corr.chess, is no problem - corr. chess runs with this approach since years here and it runs well, it has less cheaters then other sites.
And apart from tourneys, if you want to take corr. chess more serious, there are 2 major functions missing:
1)opponent has played at least .... games (otherwise I must always abort dozens of games vs. opponents with no existing track record)
2)opponent average move speed
