I have 2 friends who are rated 1800 on chess.com but nearly 2100 on lichess (talking of bullet ratings - blitz ratings on chess.com are higher).
Seems that lichess ratings are much higher then chess.com ratings, aren't they..
Backed is this assumption also by the percentile score: if you are rated 1800 on chess.com, your chess.com percentile score is around 97,5 % (what means that you are better then 97,5 % of the players on chess.com) while even a rating of 2100 on lichess scores only 96 % (so you are with 300 points higher only better then 96 % of the players on lichess)
Seems that lichess ratings are much higher then chess.com ratings, aren't they..
Backed is this assumption also by the percentile score: if you are rated 1800 on chess.com, your chess.com percentile score is around 97,5 % (what means that you are better then 97,5 % of the players on chess.com) while even a rating of 2100 on lichess scores only 96 % (so you are with 300 points higher only better then 96 % of the players on lichess)