What is the chess version "harmony chess" ?

@Bishop1964

So, you can add or remove pawns on the chessboard until your purported puzzle is solved?

Yes, you can do that, but what's the point? Your first puzzle has no solution as I have told you already.

Listen, we have a similar puzzle in the real world and is much much more interesting than yours, and in 3D! It's called the RUBIK'S CUBE.

@threadstripper

I know RUBIK'S CUBE. I am even able to solve the 4x4x4 version. But this is challenging because it takes a lot of time. Someone needs a lot of patience. Can't be solved in less than 20 seconds like the 3x3x3 version.

But it is a good example. I guess my "harmony chess version" which I have in mind, could easily be compared to the 4x4x4 version of the RUBIK'S CUBE.

@threadstripper

I have to add one more thing, which came to my mind right now.

My "harmony chess version" seems to be very difficult. But if only one person plays both sides, than it will be solvable. One person can try to play a perfect strategy.

But this version must be played later with this 2 players. And these players are not able to talk to each other to find a common strategy. Then this stuff becomes much more challenging.

You can compare this to standard chess, where 4 players play against each other. 2 players for white and 2 players for black.
But all players are not allowed to talk to each other.
If "white player no. 1" comes up with a good plan, it is very certain that "white player no. 2" messes everything up, because he maybe doesn't understand what his comrade has in mind.

Does such a chess version already exist on Lichess ? I guess not ! That would also be great fun.
2 players against 2 players.
I guess @dboing would love such a chess version ?

@Bishop1964 You are just saying that if one of the players is an idiot, the puzzle will never be solved! Correct.

Why should I play such a game then?

@threadstripper

Where did I write that one of the players is an idiot ? I don't understand why you try to twist my words around and interprete them in such a negative way.

I am simply trying to invent a new kind of funny chess version here.

How do you think that it was possible to develop all the other funny chess versions like "antichess", "King of the Hill" and so on.

Everything started with an idea and people worked on this idea. I don't know how many versions got lost because they were not playable. I don't know this. Therefore I started this thread.

I never claimed that this version is playable right now. I am looking for people who have an interest in this idea and want to contribute to this idea in a positive way.

But it is quiet obvious for me right now after several of your postings.

You are not a person who is able to participate in a positive way to such a project.

Maybe because you are always a negative person, maybe because you simply lack the wit for such an idea.

Your negative feedback isn't helpful at all. Try to learn how constructive criticism works.

I think that this variation would be better suited as a puzzle, with predetermined, solvable positions, than as an actual game

@clousems

I have to admit that this whole idea came to my mind after I saw a few jigsaw puzzles somewhere on the planet. See *****.

If you play this chess version alone or if it is played between two communicating players than it is definitely a puzzle.

Of course, This changes if it is played between 2 players, who don't communicate.

(**** : The following information is only for one insider. The rest of you will be confused. Please skip.
A few days ago,I was bored a little bit and tried to stalked Grover Cleveland on the internet. I found this funny site with a lot of jigsaw puzzles. But I could not stay very long, because I was scared, because there was a cat sitting on a pumpkin. People who know, who I am really, can understand that. But the puzzle idea got stuck somewhere in my head. If you need more information, please send me a personal message. It is funny, maybe it is only a coincidence ?)

Nice try @threadstripper

But how should this be possible. How can I leave my own thread ? Don't threaten me !

This will not work, because I am Mahatma Gandhi.

I have sympathy for all people, even for those who live on the street and of course also for those who live in sewers.

(I only use your own words which you wrote in your profile to describe your living circumstances. I guess you will change your profile within seconds after this posting. Bet 6.66€)

I'm glad we can have nice conversations without resorting to insults

@threadstripper

I guess you have already lost your credibility in this forum.

It is completely unacceptable to insult someone as a facist pig. This is complete inappropriate behaviour.

I allow you to take your postings #28, #31, #33, #34 back. Redact them now and I will forgive you.

Don't cry for help, that doesn't fit to you.

And remove this description in your profile about living on the street or sometimes in the sewer.

Even an idiot can see at first sight what kind of person you are.

Don't try to fight with words, you will lose this game, because you have already lost it by showing who you really are.

If you don't do it right now, I will find a way to complain in a very efficient way against you. It is not very complicated to find out who will win.

The guy (=me) who tries to improve LiChess or the guy who tries to destroy Lichess by using bad language.

(By the way, I edit a lot of my own threads. This is prove for nothing. I always try to remove all my typos and grammar errors. I am even obsessed by that.)

I have edited this posting #35 now 11 times becaue I wanted to add or remove something or correct my spelling somewhere