Is Trump finally going down or do we have to suffer much longer?

@JoelHoge #480

No. No. No.

I flatly refuse to speak for myself.
Never!
I have my schmimschmams to do all my working, talking, squawking and evesdropping for me.
Thank you.

@JoelHoge

Neocons and Christian crusaders called, they want their obsolete warmongering Christian supremacy back. Perhaps you're an End Times kind of guy.

Human decency and rights are timeless. War, nuclear weapons, neoliberalism, etc are dying. Hopefully before the life support system called Earth is destroyed.

"Simple logic" AKA Fox~News~?

"LetGoOfMyChessEho: The 60's called, they want their obsolete anti-Americanism back. You should thank your lucky star that any hegemony is American and not, say Chinese. That may all change if someone like Bernie Marx comes to power."

And please... Once again obsolete anti nuclear b.s. The very existence of nuclear bombs forces states to have them in their defensive arsenal as a deterrent. If America got rid of their nuclear bombs they would be completely dominated by any state that has them. Simple logic."

Trump tweeted on Jan 5 he would target Iranian cultural sites. Is this lunatic aware that targeting cultural sites is a war crime?

Not a good look,is it?...POTUS saying America condones war crimes .

@WhiteTrash96 Lol.

@Letgoofmychessego

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but outside of land of make-believe sane people with some basic knowledge of mankind and its history knows that war is nothing more than the physical manifestation of actual conflicts of interest. I want peace as much as the next guy but obviously not at any price. If the U.S were such naive pacifists like you during the 40's, Hitler would probably have won the war.

I'm not "fond of" nuclear weapons; in that sense, I would have preferred it if E=MC^2 were erased from Einstein's paper. But once it's there, it's there. A simple analysis of cause and effect would discourage anyone but halfwits from nuclear disarmament, since it would remove any deterrent from others still in possession to take whatever action they wished to pursue.

#484:
After searching the twitter, I couldn't find that post that you are referring to. I did, however, find out that almost all US politicians (with the exception of Mike Pence, weirdly enough) use twitter to attack everyone else. It's honestly kind of impressive; even McConnell and Sanders know how to use the internet.

just like in the uk the noisy left were swept aside and we have not heard from them since

just like trump will keep winning because the other options are so weak and absurd and traitorous just like the lefts actions were in the uk just like trudeau macron merkel will all be found out for what they are

but they finally got the message after failing to accept brexit as they knew best

maga potus

happy new year

@JoelHoge

"I want peace as much as the next guy but ..." I make poor excuses for war.

Let's get to something deeper than your fluffy replies such as "I'm sorry to burst your bubble" and "~hippie!~" What gives any person or state the right to bomb persons and places? It's barbaric.

<<< I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but outside of land of make-believe sane people with some basic knowledge of mankind and its history knows that war is nothing more than the physical manifestation of actual conflicts of interest. I want peace as much as the next guy but obviously not at any price. If the U.S were such naive pacifists like you during the 40's, Hitler would probably have won the war.

I'm not "fond of" nuclear weapons; in that sense, I would have preferred it if E=MC^2 were erased from Einstein's paper. But once it's there, it's there. A simple analysis of cause and effect would discourage anyone but halfwits from nuclear disarmament, since it would remove any deterrent from others still in possession to take whatever action they wished to pursue. >>>

Santorum > Trump

@Letgoofmychessego maybe you are given the right to bomb people when they attack a peaceful embassy, killing 25 Innocent people. Maybe the Iranian government should've thought that one through. (sorry about the grammar I must use google translate for this because i don't speak english )

#488

What gives any person or state the right to bomb persons and places?

I would imagine the right to self defense does, and so does the duty to destroy evil such as that scumbag terrorist leader that Trump had the guts to order killed while the other Presidents did not.