In the past (as recently as September), when exporting a Swiss TRF via lichess.org/api#operation/swissTrf, the players were sorted by their score/tiebreaks. It appears this has changed - now they are sorted by rating. @thibault, was this a recent change?
Is this possibly related to github.com/ornicar/lila/issues/7434?
#1 Please provide an example so I may understand.
curl lichess.org/swiss/QcOLMSrw.trf
012 K-12 U1300 Section: Q300 Home
022 lichess.org/swiss/QcOLMSrw
032 Lichess
042 Nov 15, 2020
052 Nov 15, 2020
062 25
092 Individual: Swiss-System
102 lichess.org/swiss
XXR 4
XXC black1
001 1 bujurocks 1930 3.5 4 w 1 10 b 1 3 w 1 14 b =
001 2 lh2013 1760 3.0 17 w 1 13 b 1 12 w 1 3 b 0
001 3 cooldude2009 1697 3.0 18 w 1 9 b 1 1 b 0 2 w 1
001 4 lonebravetiger 1673 2.0 1 b 0 22 w 1 15 b 1 9 w 0
001 5 superleo2020 1640 3.0 25 b 1 19 w 1 14 b 0 10 w 1
001 6 arionik 1617 3.0 7 w 0 21 b 1 8 w 1 12 b 1
001 7 loyalcrow 1610 2.0 6 b 1 12 w 0 9 b 0 19 w 1
001 8 jmand 1608 2.0 19 b 0 23 w 1 6 b 0 11 w 1
001 9 teamvanderbilt 1607 3.0 16 b 1 3 w 0 7 w 1 4 b 1
001 10 lincolnlc 1583 2.0 23 w 1 1 w 0 19 b 1 5 b 0
001 11 aidan166 1569 1.5 H - 18 w 1 8 b 0
001 12 user_liam 1544 2.0 21 w 1 7 b 1 2 b 0 6 w 0
001 13 dclion 1542 2.0 24 w 1 2 w 0 16 b 0 18 b 1
001 14 steewad 1532 3.5 15 w 1 20 b 1 5 w 1 1 w =
001 15 waileas 1525 1.0 14 b 0 24 w 1 4 w 0 17 b 0
001 16 dadacc 1479 3.0 9 w 0 17 b 1 13 w 1 20 b 1
001 17 dorothyma 1478 2.0 2 b 0 16 w 0 24 b 1 15 w 1
001 18 august2012 1440 1.0 3 b 0 25 w 1 11 b 0 13 w 0
001 19 nobody123456 1429 1.0 8 w 1 5 b 0 10 w 0 7 b 0
001 20 sabsmsangelina 1410 1.5 H 14 w 0 22 b 1 16 w 0
001 21 sakyla 1404 2.0 12 b 0 6 w 0 23 b 1 22 w 1
001 22 folkmermaid3083 1291 0.5 H 4 b 0 20 w 0 21 b 0
001 23 arcticfury 1255 0.5 10 b 0 8 b 0 21 w 0 24 w =
001 24 greenmonkey7 1241 0.5 13 b 0 15 b 0 17 w 0 23 b =
001 25 emerysach 1170 1.0 5 w 0 18 b 0 U -
012 K-12 U1300 Section: Q300 Home
022 lichess.org/swiss/QcOLMSrw
032 Lichess
042 Nov 15, 2020
052 Nov 15, 2020
062 25
092 Individual: Swiss-System
102 lichess.org/swiss
XXR 4
XXC black1
001 1 bujurocks 1930 3.5 4 w 1 10 b 1 3 w 1 14 b =
001 2 lh2013 1760 3.0 17 w 1 13 b 1 12 w 1 3 b 0
001 3 cooldude2009 1697 3.0 18 w 1 9 b 1 1 b 0 2 w 1
001 4 lonebravetiger 1673 2.0 1 b 0 22 w 1 15 b 1 9 w 0
001 5 superleo2020 1640 3.0 25 b 1 19 w 1 14 b 0 10 w 1
001 6 arionik 1617 3.0 7 w 0 21 b 1 8 w 1 12 b 1
001 7 loyalcrow 1610 2.0 6 b 1 12 w 0 9 b 0 19 w 1
001 8 jmand 1608 2.0 19 b 0 23 w 1 6 b 0 11 w 1
001 9 teamvanderbilt 1607 3.0 16 b 1 3 w 0 7 w 1 4 b 1
001 10 lincolnlc 1583 2.0 23 w 1 1 w 0 19 b 1 5 b 0
001 11 aidan166 1569 1.5 H - 18 w 1 8 b 0
001 12 user_liam 1544 2.0 21 w 1 7 b 1 2 b 0 6 w 0
001 13 dclion 1542 2.0 24 w 1 2 w 0 16 b 0 18 b 1
001 14 steewad 1532 3.5 15 w 1 20 b 1 5 w 1 1 w =
001 15 waileas 1525 1.0 14 b 0 24 w 1 4 w 0 17 b 0
001 16 dadacc 1479 3.0 9 w 0 17 b 1 13 w 1 20 b 1
001 17 dorothyma 1478 2.0 2 b 0 16 w 0 24 b 1 15 w 1
001 18 august2012 1440 1.0 3 b 0 25 w 1 11 b 0 13 w 0
001 19 nobody123456 1429 1.0 8 w 1 5 b 0 10 w 0 7 b 0
001 20 sabsmsangelina 1410 1.5 H 14 w 0 22 b 1 16 w 0
001 21 sakyla 1404 2.0 12 b 0 6 w 0 23 b 1 22 w 1
001 22 folkmermaid3083 1291 0.5 H 4 b 0 20 w 0 21 b 0
001 23 arcticfury 1255 0.5 10 b 0 8 b 0 21 w 0 24 w =
001 24 greenmonkey7 1241 0.5 13 b 0 15 b 0 17 w 0 23 b =
001 25 emerysach 1170 1.0 5 w 0 18 b 0 U -
The players above are sorted by rating, not by # of points
Hello,
Players are sorted by "Startingrank-Number" following the official vocabulary of FIDE: www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/C04Annex2_TRF16.pdf
The TRF specification does not request players to be sorted in any way but Lichess gracefully handle that to compensate a bug of `Swiss Manager` (issue reference: github.com/ornicar/lila/issues/7434)
Can I ask what's the problem with this order?
Players are sorted by "Startingrank-Number" following the official vocabulary of FIDE: www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/C04Annex2_TRF16.pdf
The TRF specification does not request players to be sorted in any way but Lichess gracefully handle that to compensate a bug of `Swiss Manager` (issue reference: github.com/ornicar/lila/issues/7434)
Can I ask what's the problem with this order?
It would not be a problem if done this way to begin with. I discovered the change in the middle of a tournament, and was forced to do emergency code-around. Sorting on my side is simple, but to display results correctly (+1, -2, =3, etc.) I need to re-index the players.
May I suggest backward compatibility - something like /swiss/QcOLMSrw.trf?sort=result
May I suggest backward compatibility - something like /swiss/QcOLMSrw.trf?sort=result
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.